A Stunning 400 MILLION PEOPLE Are On Lockdown In China Because Of 600 DEATHS ?

ROTFLMAO !!! . . . You can’t make this stuff up . . . Oh wait

No, No, it won´t go away! And…. it shouldn´t!!

You protected your babies like a mother does.

Beautiful glass bead. Thank you.

Hi, you two! (Reposting because the prior version appeared garbled…)

You invited comment…

Regardless of anything else about Romney—and isn’t it possible to consider particular acts on what might indeed be their own terms?—could not his vote actually have been, as he stated, a “matter of conscience” for him?

I don’t agree with him, but don’t people have a right to “vote their conscience”?

I know his faith tradition well. He strikes me, in this matter, as acting in accord with his conscience. Isn’t that an honorable thing to do, regardless?

I think it is…obviously…

Your pal,
Doug

New Vaccines will permanently alter your DNA by
Jon Rappaport nomorefakenews.com
I repost this story now because, in the rush to develop a vaccine against the China coronavirus in the next 90 days, public health officials are mentioning several experimental technologies—never before released openly for public use.

One of those technologies is: DNA insertion.

The reference is the New York Times, 3/15/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:

“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

“‘The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”

“The first human trial based on this strategy – called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. – is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was nearly five years ago.]

“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”

Alteration of the human genetic makeup.

Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence.

The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:

“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”

Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.

This is genetic roulette with a loaded gun.

And the further implications are clear. Vaccines can be used as a cover for the injections of any and all genes, whose actual purpose is unannounced.

The emergence of this Frankenstein technology is paralleled by a shrill push to mandate vaccines, across the board, for both children and adults. The pressure and propaganda are planet-wide.

The freedom and the right to refuse vaccines has always been vital. It is more vital than ever now.

What does wall to wall propaganda about an “ominous epidemic” achieve? You have one answer. If it doesn’t immediately pop into your head, read this article again.

I believe what Nancy Pelosi did is actually a statutory crime.

The Constitution states clearly, “He [the President] shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient;” (Article II, Section 3).

Follow my logic here:

The President did clearly hand a bound (and I am assuming signed) document to the chief officers of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and said document contained such recommendations as the President judged to be “necessary and expedient,” and the two officers, who are also elected officials, did take receipt of said documents in plain view of all. These then became (legal) documents that were filed or deposited with officers in public office.

Look at the clear language of, 18 U.S. Code § 2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally:

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

It doesn’t take a lawyer to figure out that Nancy Pelosi violated both elements of this statute. There should be an investigation to make sure it indeed was the document that was handed to her that was destroyed, and that Trump had signed it, etc., but if it was, then the “shall” language of part (b) is pretty clear, and she has indeed forfeit her office and stands disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

Q.E.D.