Al Shabaab – Strategic Culture Foundation https://www.strategic-culture.org Strategic Culture Foundation provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Sun, 10 Apr 2022 20:53:47 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.16 Trump’s Ploy in Somalia Could Lead to a Civil War Which Would End Any Hopes of Qatar Deal https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/12/09/trumps-ploy-somalia-could-lead-to-civil-war-which-would-end-any-hopes-qatar-deal/ Wed, 09 Dec 2020 18:45:16 +0000 https://www.strategic-culture.org/?post_type=article&p=613905 For Trump to pull out U.S. forces in Somalia might seem petulant if not outright childish. But the move will not only cause a humanitarian catastrophe the world has yet to see, but it will also pitch regional players against one another.

You may not know exactly where Somalia is. Or really much about its history. But this unique African country on the North Eastern tip of the African continent – which was both a former Italian and British colony – is going to be in the newspapers you read and on your social media timelines a lot in 2021 – if the petulant outgoing president Trump gets his way and pulls out 700 or so U.S. troops.

While it’s still unclear whether Trump will really go ahead with the total troop withdrawal of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, which will almost certainly lead to the Taliban gaining the upper hand during the so-called Doha peace talks, in Somalia it is almost certain he will go ahead with the ruse, because its impact – he probably believes – will be less and will draw less wrath from the press. Somalia is bite-sized, he will figure.

But he couldn’t be more wrong.

Somalia, a troubled country which fell into the abyss in 1991 and has been controlled by terrorist groups since, is more important than most western journalists realise. And although the small contingent of U.S. troops there is tiny, in terms of military capabilities, it is hugely symbolic in keeping the international community there and preventing the country slide into a civil war.

The worry from many Somali apparatchiks is that if the U.S. pulls out, then the rest of the international contingent – including the EU and several important European governments – will also do the same, leaving the country vulnerable to Al Shabab taking total control over a fragile patchwork of troubled federal states. Of course, there will be resistance to this from a great many clan leaders who will feel they have no choice now other than to remove the knife from the sheaf to defend their lands and their political enclaves.

Initially it was Bill Clinton, who, almost as soon as taking office in January 1993 was presented with the problem of armed clans taking all of the food aid arriving in the port of Mogadishu, causing a famine in the interior. The democrat president from Arkansas signed off for U.S. troops to go in, which led to the Black Hawk Down catastrophe, which Clinton never really recovered from on the international circuit, even contributing to the genocide in Rwanda, following the Tutsi coup which was also an ill-conceived CIA plan which blew up in everyone’s face.

Will Joe Biden and his new secretary of state Antony Blinken suffer a similar ill fate when they take office in January?

For years, Somalia has been on the brink of a brink of a total civil and military meltdown. The only stalwart measure of wisdom from the west, which has prevented total calamity leading to an inevitable civil war, was keeping U.S. troops there as a reminder that America has the ability to strike quickly if it needs to. To remove those soldiers, as Trump is likely to do, for most educated Somalis is for the country to take a suicide pill.

Al Shabab’s roots are in a Salafi extremist movement which was born from the post-Siad Barre period but later boosted both by foreign jihadists post 9/11 under the affiliation to Al Qaeda – and then an invasion by Ethiopia in 2006 which swelled its ranks even further. It had, at one point, taken control of the capital but was pushed back by a UN-backed African Union peace-keeping mission. The very real worry is that this mission AMISOM simply won’t be able to cope with anarchy on all sides as its resources are limited. It simply won’t be able to operate in a civil war situation even with the present numbers of U.S. troops and other contingents there. Certainly if U.S. troops pull out, this will be the hair trigger that starts a civil war on all fronts.

Yet unlike before, the situation is made even more complicated by Somalia’s relationships in recent years with regional powers who some might argue would thrive in the chaos of civil war and revel in the opportunity to pursue their agendas. Qatar has always had an opaque, if not two-faced relationship with the Somali government and is often accused of fuelling terrorism within Somalia, pitching one clan against another. It is also often accused outright of wrecking the relative peace that the country’s president Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo had built, when Doha raised the stakes in the so-called special relationship and installed their own TV propagandist from Al Jazeera into the position of security chief.

What happens to Faramaajo when the country slides into civil war? Does he become the puppet which Qatar props up, exactly in the same way the Saudis kept Yemen’s president in office, Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi in exile? Will Somalia be the new Yemen war which Joe Biden will be a spectator of while the world’s media catches up onto the farce of Trump’s claims to be a peace broker? As DC based analysts scramble over the idea that it could have been Trump himself to have resolved the four-year dispute between Qatar and its GCC neighbours, the final nail in that particular coffin could be Somalia, given that the UAE is also an active player in this country and has its own ambitions of hegemony there. If Faramaajo is to become Qatar’s own Hadi, no doubt exiled to Doha, then does that make the internal battle between the UAE and Saudi Arabia in Yemen, replicated more or less in Somalia? Does the UAE find its own group of rebels – Al Shabab itself? – which it backs, so as to topple “Mr Cheese”? Will the war spill over into peaceful Somaliland, a breakaway state which has its own scores to settle in Somalia?

It’s a cruel irony though that the power vacuum that Obama himself created when he reduced America’s role in the entire region to ‘soft power’ opened up a chasm for Qatar, UAE and Turkey to fill in failed states like Somalia – and now one which is about to bite Joe Biden on the arse before he even enters the Oval Office. The democrats are cursed by Somalia, it seems, but just as Bill Clinton had to make his toughest foreign policy decision almost immediately entering the Oval Office, so too will Joe Biden.

]]>
Militant group threatens additional attacks on Kenya https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/04/05/militant-group-threatens-additional-attacks-on-kenya/ Sun, 05 Apr 2015 16:38:25 +0000 https://strategic-culture.lo/news/2015/04/05/militant-group-threatens-additional-attacks-on-kenya/
Two days after al-Shabab militants slaughtered 148 people in a devastating attack on a university in northeastern Kenya, the Islamic extremists issued a chilling threat that its terrorizing of Kenya was far from over.

“Kenyan cities will run red with blood,” al-Shabab said, according to the SITE intelligence monitoring group. “No amount of precaution or safety measures will be able to guarantee your safety, thwart another attack or prevent another bloodbath.”

President Uhuru Kenyatta was defiant when he addressed the nation in response to the attacks and al-Shabab’s statement. “We will fight terrorism to the end,” he said. “I guarantee that my administration shall respond in the fiercest way possible.” He declared three days of national mourning for the victims of the attack.

A Kenyan official said that five people suspected of involvement in the massacre have been arrested and that the government is pursuing other suspects, including Mohamed Mohamud. He is a former teacher at a Kenyan madrassa, or Islamic school, and the alleged mastermind of the attack.

One of the alleged al-Shabab gunmen has been identified as the son of a Kenyan official.

A chief in Mandera County reported his son missing last year, fearing he had gone to Somali. His worst fears were confirmed Sunday when his son, Abdirahim Mohammed Abdullahi, was identifed as one of those involved the attack. All four attackers were killed by Kenyan security forces.

Abdullahi was a University of Nairobi graduate who received a law degree in 2013.

“We will bring all of them to justice,” Kenyatta said. “We are also in active pursuit of the mastermind and have placed a reward for his capture,” he said of the $220,000 being offered for information leading to Moha­mud’s arrest.

Interior Ministry spokesman Mwenda Njoka said, in a Twitter post, that three people trying to cross into Somalia were arrested by Kenyan security forces. Two other suspects were arrested at the Garissa University College campus.

Thursday’s assault on the university is the worst terrorist attack in Kenya since the bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi in 1998, which killed 224 people. An attack on the upscale Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi in September 2013 left 67 dead.

Saturday morning, a surviving Christian student was found at the university. She had been hiding in a wardrobe for two days since the attacks. Cynthia Cheroitich was taken to Garissa Hospital, where she told the Associated Press that she hid in the wardrobe, covering herself with clothing, when the attack started. She said she remained there as al-Shabab militants massacred her classmates.

She continued to hide as the militants were eventually killed by security forces and rescue workers evacuated surviving students. Even as volunteers began mopping the bloodied dormitories, she kept hiding. Cheroitich told the AP that when rescuers came, she thought they were militants and refused to emerge. It took one of her teachers to coax her out of her hiding place.

Families in Kenya attack learn fates of loved ones
 
“I was just praying to my God,” Cheroitich said.

The bodies of many of those killed in Garissa have been transported to the capital, Nairobi, and hundreds of surviving students were bused back to their homes Friday.

Life in Garissa is slowly beginning to return to normal, but citizens are reeling from the attacks.

“What has happened is sad; it’s devastating,” said Hassan Sheikh Ali, the first principal of Garissa University College. “This is the only university in the entire pastoralist domain, and unfortunately the same university has been destroyed. All that we have been building, all the hopes we had, destroyed.”

Many Garissa residents channeled their emotions by turning out in the traffic-clogged streets Saturday to view the bodies of four men alleged to have taken part in the assault, even as Somali militants issued a statement threatening Kenya with more attacks.

Some wanted desperately to verify that the attackers weren’t their countrymen, others wanted to see if they recognized a face, and still others wanted to see that those capable of such brutal acts had experienced some vague form of justice.

“I want to see them,” Muna Haji said. “I want to know that these people are dead. They have killed innocent people.”

The four naked bodies were loaded haphazardly into the back of a pickup truck at the morgue where they had been held since morning. Local and international forensics teams had taken their clothes as evidence.

The truck paraded the bodies through town as residents ran alongside, clamoring for a glimpse, until it arrived at Garissa Primary School, where about 2,000 people had gathered. There, it parked, and the bodies sat. Flies gathered on the bloated limbs hanging from the truck bed as the crowd swelled.

“Are those the real terrorists? During Westgate, we never found out whether the terrorists were really killed,” said Abdihakim Mowlio, an intern at Garissa Provincial General Hospital, referring to the deadly Westgate mall attack. “If they show the dead bodies, we believe that they’ve really been killed. We’ll feel safer because we’ve seen that the government has actually responded.”

As it had with its previous assaults in Kenya, which have claimed the lives of more than 200 Kenyans in the past two years, al-Shabab said the attacks were in retaliation for Kenya’s 2011 invasion of Somalia and its continued presence in the country. The invasion — called Operation Linda Nchi — was allegedly in response to the kidnapping of Westerners in northeastern Kenya.

“Since October 2011, Kenya has been the most insecure that we have seen in decades. If going into Somalia was to secure Kenya, then they have failed,” said Abdullahi Halakhe, a Horn of Africa analyst with Amnesty International. “The elephant in the room is what is Kenya’s plan as far as Somalia is concerned? What does the exit plan look like? Is it two years, is it three years?”

Abigail Higgins, washingtonpost.com
]]>
Who is Behind the Slaughter of Christians in Kenya? https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/04/05/who-behind-slaughter-christians-kenya/ Sun, 05 Apr 2015 15:29:02 +0000 https://strategic-culture.lo/news/2015/04/05/who-behind-slaughter-christians-kenya/ On April 2, terrorists committed one of the worst terrorist attacks in Kenya. Up to 150 people were murdered by masked al-Shabaab terrorists who raided the Garissa University College campus. (1) A few dozen people were wounded. Hundreds of hostages were freed as a result of special operation conducted by government security forces. 

A wave of terrorist attacks hit Kenya after Somalia collapsed as a unified state with large swathes of its territory going out of government control. Al-Shabab is a leading Somalian terrorist group. On September 21, 2013, its gunmen attacked the upmarket Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi, the capital of Kenya. The attack resulted in at over 80 deaths. The Garissa attacks in many respects resemble the Nairobi terrorist act. The al-Shahab militants killed only those who said they were Christians while letting go the people who said their faith was Islam. The Nairobi slaughter was organized on the eve of Catholic Good Friday. 

Al-Shabab (2) is a Wahhabi terrorist group. Its troop strength is estimated at 7,000 to 9,000 militants. By and large, it employs the same tactics as Boco Harum in Nigeria. The both organizations strike Christians with utmost cruelty and do their best to attract public attention to the committed acts. To achieve the desired effect they target Christian churches during religious holidays. 

There are a few things worth to be noted in relation to the Garissa attack. First, al-Shabab is based on the Somalian territory beyond the government’s control. Since 1991 (3) the Somalian «presidents’ and «governments» have been coming and going while the UN-supported transitional federal government’s control never extended beyond some districts of the capital (it has never succeeded in establishing control over the entirety of Mogadishu). Somalia is a safe haven for various terrorist groups. Second, the actual absence of central government does not mean there is no power at all. Groups like al-Shabab compete for influence. The African Union offers the government military aid. (4) The al-Shabab militants would have done better by concentrating on internal strife than staging raids in neighboring Kenya – the actions that seemingly do not serve any purpose. Why cover the distance of 200 kilometers to the Kenyan border? Why choose Garissa as a target? Third, the al-Shabab’s actions seem to have no relation to the declared goals. It’s hard to imagine the group trying to spread Islam in the predominantly Christian Kenya. (5) Then why commit the terrorist acts at all? 

As in the case of Boco Harum the mission is to incite ethnic hatred. They want to make Christians hate Muslims. This is the way to plunge Kenya and Nigeria into internal chaos. It’s not just a coincidence that the International Criminal Court is investigating the situations in the both countries. The leadership of these two states should be prevented from cracking down on terror. Each time one of the governments makes an attempt to do it the International Criminal Court says it is guilty of human rights violations. In case of Kenya, the government is accused of war crimes. The case of Uhuru Kenyatta, the incumbent president of Kenya, was closed under the pressure of the African Union. The organization threatened to withdraw from the Rome Statute. The International Criminal Court’ trial of Kenya's vice-president, William Ruto, continues. 

The mass terror attacks in the country started at the time the country achieved some economic success. In the early 2000s substantial crude oil deposits were found there. The government has made a deal with China to attract investments into oil production. The terror attacks from Somalia make Kenya subject to never ending instability. The US military 1992-1995 operation in Somalia is widely believed to have failed. There is ground to believe it’s not so. In reality the operation was quite a success. Media painted it as a defeat to disguise the real goal – to have a large territory beyond the control of any government – a unique place on the world map (at least on such a scale). 

* * *

These days we have become the witnesses of how 147 Kenyan boys and girls died as martyrs when they confessed of being Christians looking in to the eyes of death. Let’s face up to reality – the global forces destabilize Kenya, Nigeria and other countries that strive for self-determination and independence. The implementation of their evil plans would require many more victims. 

Footnotes:
 
(1) Garissa is a Kenyan city located about 400 km east of Nairobi. 
(2) Full name – Harakat al-Shabaab al-Mujahideen («Mujahideen Youth Movement").
(3) The year former president Siad Barre was overthrown.
(4) Report of the United Nations Secretary General on Somalia, January 23, 2015 
(5) Christians account for over 82% of the Kenya’s population Islam is the second largest religion practiced by over 11% of the total population. 
]]>
Al Shabaab Benefited from Western Destruction of Libyan State https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/04/03/al-shabaab-benefited-from-western-destruction-of-libyan-state/ Fri, 03 Apr 2015 19:17:39 +0000 https://strategic-culture.lo/news/2015/04/03/al-shabaab-benefited-from-western-destruction-of-libyan-state/ Al Shabaab, the Islamic terrorist group that has just laid siege to a Kenyan university, killing nearly 150 people, benefited from the 2011 Western aggression that backed al Qaeda and affiliated militias to destroy the state of Libya:
 
The Telegraph: Libyan arms that went missing during the fighting to remove Col Muammar Gaddafi are now spreading even further afield…
 
The new report by a special UN security council committee suggests that they have now travelled even further, with Libyan ammunition showing up in the continuing war being waged by al-Shabab [pictured above], an al-Qaeda offshoot in Somalia.
 
Somalia borders Kenya, where Al Shabaab has just attacked a university.
 
Al Shabaab has “Wahhabi roots”; Wahhabism is the extremist version of Islam exported by missionary theocracy Saudi Arabia, which is itself currently carrying out US-coordinated terrorist attacks against people in Yemen.  “Al-Wahhab’s teachings are state-sponsored and are the official form of Sunni Islam in 21st century Saudi Arabia”.
 
In addition to support for Saudi Arabia dating to the 1930s, the US has on numerous occasions openly or indirectly supported al Qaeda and other Wahhabi terrorist groups.
 
The Western aggression that destroyed Libya also benefitted other al Qaeda and al Qaeda linked militias, such as Boko Haram:
 
Al Jazeera: “…heavy weapons such as SAM-7 anti-aircraft and anti-tank missiles…were either surreptitiously obtained by posing as Gaddafi’s supporters or indirectly purchased from mercenaries who had acquired these arms from Libyan depositories. …these arms have been transferred to groups such as Ansar Dine, Boko Haram and MUJAO, emboldening and enabling them to mount more deadly and audacious attacks.
 
Commentary Magazine: “Unsecured Libyan weapons went to Boko Haram”
 
Human Rights First: “Unsecured Libyan stockpiles empower Boko Haram and destabilize African Sahel”
 
NBC News: “Apart from benefiting from sympathizers in the Nigerian military, the Islamic terror group is able to purchase small arms and occasionally some larger weaponry in nearby conflict zones, ‘probably Libya’ … The collapse of Libya has further flooded the market”
 
Reuters and United Nations: “The Libyan civil war may have given militant groups in Africa’s Sahel region like Boko Haram and al Qaeda access to large weapons caches, according to a U.N. report released on Thursday. … Boko Haram killed more than 500 people last year and more than 250 this year in Nigeria.”
 
Washington Post: “Boko Haram … militants, who traveled to northern Mali last year to join the fight there, have returned with heavy weapons from Libya, presumably from former Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi’s arsenal.”
 
Robert Barsocchini, globalresearch.ca
]]>
Is Turkey on the Cusp of Rethink on Syria? https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2013/10/08/is-turkey-on-the-cusp-of-rethink-on-syria/ Mon, 07 Oct 2013 20:00:01 +0000 https://strategic-culture.lo/news/2013/10/08/is-turkey-on-the-cusp-of-rethink-on-syria/ Through the past two-year period of turmoil in Syria, President Bashar Al-Assad has shown himself to be a master tactician who consistently outmaneuvered his regional adversaries. Syria has a tough neighborhood. Al-Assad’s regional adversaries are formidable people in their own ways. But he invariably pre-empted them, staying one step ahead of them, repeatedly forcing them onto the back foot and throwing into disarray their best-laid plots. 

That’s what makes his latest interview last week with the Turkish television channel Halk rather significant. Al-Assad came down very hard on Turkey’s Syria policies and on Prime Minister Recep Erdogan personally. He warned Ankara of a blowback of terrorism that it has been promoting in Syria – «In the near future these terrorists will have an impact on Turkey. Turkey will pay very dearly…» 

"All that he [Erdogan] says about Syria and its people is a heap of lies, that is all … Erdoğan is doing nothing but supporting the terrorists," said al-Assad. 

On the face of it, al-Assad’s warning came in the wake of the growing presence of al-Qaeda-linked rebels in the region close to the Syrian border with Turkey and against the backdrop of persistent reports that there is a nexus between some of these extremist groups and Ankara as part of the latter’s stratagem to prop up a counterweight to the Syrian Kurds

The Turks by and large do not want to get involved in what they see as Syria’s internal affairs. The secular-minded Turks abhor Erdogan’s sectarian politics in particular. There is also growing concern among the Turkish elites that the al-Qaeda-affiliated jihadist groups are gaining strength in Syria. The prominent Turkish columnist and opinion maker Murat Yetkin wrote in the Hurriyet newspaper in the weekend, 

«Unfortunately, there is little room for optimism under the current circumstances in the Middle East (in the greater sense) where, especially after the rise and fall of the Arab Spring wave, the Islamic movements with rising popularity are not the moderate ones who stay away from terrorism, including the Muslim Brotherhood. The popularity of al-Qaeda affiliated jihadist groups is gaining strength.

«With the Arab Spring having failed in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya and in the disastrous example of Syria, al-Qaeda is gaining ground, forming regional battlefields to seize power in places like Mali, Somalia, Yemen, and Syria, by merging its fighters from neighboring areas and countries.»

Erdogan has been in denial mode all along, but lately his rhetoric is changing. A defining moment would have been the attack on the Turkish embassy in Mogadishu in July by the al-Qaeda-linked al-Shabaab organization. Meanwhile, other factors also would have worked on his thinking, especially the western pressure on him to snap Turkey’s clandestine links with the extremist groups in Syria. 

At any rate, following al-Shabaab’s attack in Nairobi two weeks ago, Erdogan has openly come out for the first time «against all kinds of extreme ends» in Syria and he mentioned the names of al-Qaeda and the al-Nusra Front. Last week he called them terrorists. A poignant moment has indeed arisen. 

As Sedat Ergin, the influential columnist wrote last week, «The irony is that Turkey provided important support to these groups’ transition to Syria and other activities, with the perception that ‘the end of toppling al-Assad justifies the means’… Now the situation is as follows: On what scale this verbal position [by Erdogan] actually be implemented, for example on the Turkey-Syria border». 

Meanwhile, Turkey’s domestic politics is hotting up and Erdogan also chose the weekend to announce he’d run in the presidential election next year if his party asked him to do so. But there has been speculation lately that the incumbent president Abdullah Gul (who also was a founding member of the ruling Justice and Development Party) might as well seek a second term. 

Erdogan’s disastrous Syria policies may come to haunt him in next year’s election, especially if any ugly security situation develops on the border with Syria involving the al-Qaeda-affiliated groups that are establishing themselves there. 

The Turkish leadership has been speaking in innuendos regarding Ankara’s policies toward Syria. This surged in a major policy speech by President Gul on Friday at Istanbul. Syria was the topic of the speech, embedded within certain meaningful remarks regarding the balance of power in world politics and democratization process in the new Middle East. 

Gul underscored that the international system «will enjoy a reasonable balance» only if the United States, which is the biggest military power but «not the sole player in the global order» would have an «accord» with other «leading actors». Most certainly, he had Russia and Iran on his mind. 

In fact, Gul welcomed US-Iran talks as a positive factor for the resolution of the Syrian crisis. Secondly, Gul stressed, «It would not be realistic to expect political systems, which will pave the way for democratic progress and culture to emerge in a single stroke. In no country can the transition to democracy be achieved overnight. This requires a certain process… the pace of democracy is closely related to the special conditions and internal dynamics of societies.» 

Interestingly, Gul estimated that the «most critical country in the transformation process» in the Middle East is not Syria, but Egypt, where, he lamented, «the historic journey to democracy… has been interrupted.» 

Significantly, he cited the existence of radical and extremist groups in Syria and noted this has «caused some hesitations in the US and Western public.» Gul added, «The Syria issue is stuck in the dilemma about whether Syria will gradually come under the control of the radical and extreme groups or Baath-like regime.» 

But Gul warned that «this approach might further prolong the existing deadlock in Syria.» He, therefore, proposed an «exit road» for the international community through a «comprehensive diplomatic and political solution,» which leaves no scope for «diplomatic ambiguity» and is based on a transition process «with a tangible calendar and modality» towards establishing «a new administration» involving «all parts of the Syrian people.» 

Gul’s speech was addressed to a regional audience at an international conference in Istanbul. It contained new thinking. His remarks on Syria were striking for their complete absence of rhetoric. He never once singled out the al-Assad for criticism. Gul even avoided apportioning blame for the chemical weapons attacks of August 21 near Damascus. 

But, equally, Gul was also addressing the Turkish opinion. His approach may not tally one hundred percent with the vast majority of Turkish public opinion that wants Ankara to altogether steer clear of the situation around Syria, but is closer to it than Erdogan’s policies. 

Consensus Corporation, a Turkish consultancy with commendable track record, recently conducted a public opinion survey and came up with the finding that two-thirds of Turkish opinion does not support Erdogan’s handling of the conflict in Syria, whereas, a 2012 survey had showed an appreciable 44% support. 

Of course, Erdogan continues to enjoy a high rating and the ruling party can be expected to romp home in the upcoming local bodies and parliamentary elections. The Turkish opposition fails to inspire, which works to Erdogan’s advantage on top of his approach to open talks with Kurdish separatists, which the Turkish public approves. 

But the recent poll also showed that next only to the economy the main concern of the Turkish public is the issue of terrorism. 

Is Turkey on the cusp of a rethink on Syria? Most certainly, if any further stimulus needed, the US Navy Seal’s operation to nab the long-sought al-Qaeda terror suspect Nzih Abdul-Hamed al-Ruqai in broad daylight on Saturday in Tripoli provides it. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization liberated Libya for the free world only a little over an year ago. Thoughtful Turks will be wondering what Syria portends. 

Al-Assad’s timing couldn’t have been better. He touched a hugely sensitive chord, given the ground reality that anyone crossing to Turkey from Syrian territory today would have to pass through some check point or the other manned by the al-Qaeda-affiliated groups. Curiously, his warning did not provoke anger in the public opinion, which seems to accept it as a statement of fact.

]]>
«We’re all Kenyans» https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2013/09/26/were-all-kenyans/ Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:00:01 +0000 https://strategic-culture.lo/news/2013/09/26/were-all-kenyans/ The anti-terrorist operation in Nairobi is over. The hostages are free; the terrorists remaining at large are hiding in the underground of Westgate shopping mole. The death toll is being counted. On September 24 it is estimated to be 62 dead and over 200 injured.

According to media reports, the Somalia's Al Qaeda affiliated Al Shabab organization did what it threatened to do since a long time ago – to attack Kenya to take revenge for Kenyan troops invading Somalia’s neighboring areas in 2011 to halt cross-border raids by militants operating on Somalian soil. Back then the Kenyan forces delivered a blow against the military structure of Al Shabab, the group that controls over 40 percent of Somalia’s territory. 

The Nairobi operation wound up with rather unexpected results. According to official sources, with 10 terrorists captured and three dead none of them happened to be the citizens of Somalia. According to the passports found, they crime perpetrators were the nationals of the United States, Great Britain and the Netherlands. It proves the fact that the criminal act was committed by an Al Qaeda affiliated international terrorist network. Its activities are coordinated and spread around the whole world; it would be erroneous to think that the terrorist acts in different countries (Yemen, Iraq, Pakistan and Kenya) were isolated cases.

The interethnic wars have been waged in Somali for many years. As time went by, Al Shabab has become a leading force pursuing the goal of creating an Islamic caliphate. Today the group controls the southern part of the country, including Kismayo, a port city in the southern Lower Juba (Jubbada Hoose) province of Somalia. It is the commercial capital of the autonomous Jubaland region. No doubt it’s an achievement for Al Qaeda affiliated forces. As a result there are two springboards of Islamic extremism situated in the vicinity of each other – the southern part of Yemen and the south of Somalia which are divided by the rather narrow strip of the Red Sea. Just like a cancer tumor it encircles the confined Bab-El-Mandeb Strait, a waterway for oil tankers. The intelligence data on the Al Qaeda’s strategic goals is not made public. The world is simply intimidated with a bogey that it just hates the human kind, so it kills people wherever it is possible. Willy-nilly one gets the impression that this kind of image is created for some purpose… 

What does Al Qaeda want to achieve in Syria? The goal is to destroy the state and create a caliphate instead. In this case why does the West fight Bashar Assad instead of Al Qaeda? 

Washington and its allies never mention the objectives pursued by terrorists in Syria or the threat they pose. Sounds strange, especially in view that, according to official version, it was Al Qaeda behind the September 11, 2001 events that caused a «historic trauma» for American people. 

If the threat to close the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait and, this way, provoke oil prices hikes is imminent, then why Washington does not sound alarm? Or do the terrorist plans coincide with the ones of American oil giants? If the war in Libya gave rise to Islamists activities in the Sahel region, then why the United Nations does not study the results of the intervention and the consequent impact on international security? Perhaps because such a study will make inevitable the recognition of the fact that the Libyan war is an example of state terrorism on the part of the West acting in concert with Al Qaeda. 

It all gives a rise to the question: if the international terrorism is steadily and effectively making new steps on the way of gaining ground, then what the United Nations Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee is doing? It was founded exactly for the purpose of fighting terrorism in the wake of terrorist acts committed in New York on September 11, 2001? To answer this question one should have a look at the way the resolution N 1373 of United Nations Security Council is implemented. 1 For instance, it states that all states shall:

«Prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts».

Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey are involved in providing funds for the terrorist groups that act of the territory of Syria. Is the Committee unaware of the fact? 

– «Freeze without delay funds and other financial assets or economic resources of persons who commit, or attempt to commit, terrorist acts or participate in or facilitate the commission of terrorist acts; of entities owned or controlled directly or indirectly by such persons; and of persons and entities acting on behalf of, or at the direction of such persons and entities, including funds derived or generated from property owned or controlled directly or indirectly by such persons and associated persons and entities».

The Islamists across the entire globe collect funds for those who «fight for the purity of faith». Neither the banking accounts, nor the routes used by couriers with cash are a secret for Western special services. So why do they not stop the financial flows? 

«Deny safe haven to those who finance, plan, support, or commit terrorist acts, or provide safe havens»;

The militants injured in combat while fighting the Syrian army are getting medical help in Israeli hospitals, Al Qaeda affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra is free to spread its propaganda on the territories of refugee camps situated in Jordan. There is nothing to say about how other provisions of the resolution N 1373 are implemented. 

«Afford one another the greatest measure of assistance in connection with criminal investigations or criminal proceedings relating to the financing or support of terrorist acts, including assistance in obtaining evidence in their possession necessary for the proceedings; of terrorist acts, including assistance in obtaining evidence in their possession necessary for the proceedings».

The Russian Special services have accumulated rather bitter experience of collaborating with Western colleagues in this field. Neither Ahmad Zakayev, the ideological leader of Chechen terrorists and the former leader of an armed gang, nor a number of other, less known, murderers have been extradited to Russia so that they could face justice. 

As a result, we have what we have. On the one hand, the terrorist threat is growing, on the other – what we have is just shooting the breeze in the United Nations, the organizations that has failed to unite the countries in a joint effort to stand up to the terrorist threat. The only thing left is to surmise that this endless breeze shooting, that starts any time the ways to counter the menace are discussed, follows some purpose. The crisis in Syria shows that Al Qaeda is useful for those who aspire to lead the process of «global control». 

The reluctance to act and fight the terrorist threat on the part of international community results in the miserable situation that the USA Today mentions in its comments on the events in Nairobi. The terrorists could attack anywhere in the world and commit the acts of horror, «After the Nairobi attack, the message should be «We Are All Kenyans». Not just in our sympathy. But also in going all out to prevent another terrorist attack».

Endnotes: 

(1) un.org

]]>
Obama, Kerry, Al Qaeda, and Al Shabaab: One big happy family https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2013/09/24/obama-kerry-al-qaeda-and-al-shabaab-one-big-happy-family/ Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:00:03 +0000 https://strategic-culture.lo/news/2013/09/24/obama-kerry-al-qaeda-and-al-shabaab-one-big-happy-family/ The attack by a cadre of Islamist Al Shabaab gunmen on the Israeli-owned Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi has focused attention, once again, on American and British links to Muslim terrorist groups, from Al Nusra Front and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant terrorists fighting the Bashar al Assad government in Syria to the Somali government of Hussein Sheik Mohamed, a Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer in a country where Al Shabaab has its political and religious roots…

President Obama and his «Responsibility to Protect» policy crew of UN ambassador Samantha Power, National Security Adviser Susan Rice, and deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes have not only made common cause with the Al Qaeda-affiliated Jabhat al Nusra and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant terrorists in Syria but by pressuring Kenya's government internationally have weakened Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and Vice President William Ruto to battle Al Shabaab terrorists who have infiltrated Kenya from neighboring Somalia

As with the shady connections of Tamerlan and Dzkokhar Tsarnaev, the accused Boston Marathon bombers, to the CIA through their uncle Ruslan Tsarni (Tsarnaev), the former son-in-law and current business partner of longtime CIA Muslim nation provocateur Graham Fuller, there are also connections between the Al Shabaab mall shooters in Western intelligence. The Al Shabaab mall attackers in Nairobi were reportedly led on the scene by Samantha Lewthwaite, a 29-year old British white woman and daughter of a British military serviceman. Lewthwaite’s attackers reportedly included three Americans and nationals of Finland, Kenya, Britain, and Canada.

Lewthwaite was married to Jamaica-born Germaine Lindsay, one of the London Underground and bus bombers killed in the July 7, 2005 terrorist attack in London. Lewthwaite met Lindsay at London’s School of Oriental and African Studies, an institution that has graduated more than a fair share of British MI-6 agents. 

Lewthwaite is now known as the «White Widow» and a deadly leader of the Al Shabaab cell that carried out the attack on the Nairobi mall. According to Twitter messages, allegedly sent by Lewthwaite, she claimed credit for the recent killing in Somalia of rival Jihadists led by her second husband, Osama al-Britani, a British national also known as Habib Ghani, and an American named Omar al-Hammani, also known as the «rapping Jihadist», an Alabama native also called «al Amriki», the American. The White Widow’s attack on the Rapping Jihadist’s group resembles the type of gang warfare rampant in some American cities.

The attack by Al Shabaab on the Westgate mall follows a costly arson fire that devastated the international terminal at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport. Many Kenyans believe that the arson attack was the work of Al Shabaab and a psychological attack on the International Criminal Court (ICC)-indicted Uhuru Kenyatta, the son of Kenya’s founder for whom the airport is named. The elder Kenyatta was despised by Barack Obama, Sr. for not appointing him Finance Minister because of what the elder Obama charged was discrimination by Kenyatta of members of the Luo tribe.

Obama could have given Kenya's government a boost by visiting the nation of his alleged father's birth during his recent trip to Africa. However, Obama has supported the ICC genocide proceedings against Kenyatta and Ruto over allegations that they were behind violence against supporters of Obama's distant cousin, Raila Odinga, during 2007 and 2008 election violence that pitted members of Ruto's Kalenjin tribe against Odinga's Luo tribe. The Kalenjins, whose loyalty had fluctuated between Odinga and Kenyatta, soon allied with Kenyatta's Kikuyu tribe against Odinga and the Luos. Obama is half Luo. 

Odinga lost the 2007 presidential election to incumbent president Mwai Kibaki, who was supported by Ruto and Kenyatta. Odinga, who was educated in the German Democratic Republic, became Prime Minister in a power-sharing agreement with Kibaki in 2008. Odinga and his «Orange» revolution, inspired by George Soros's «themed» revolutions elsewhere, including Ukraine, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan, lost to Kenyatta in the 2013 election. Odinga, in a fit of pique, boycotted Kenyatta's inauguration. Odinga has the support of not only cousin Obama but also of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and President Shimon Peres. About ten Israelis were said to have been trapped inside the Westgate Mall, but all escaped early on in the siege by Al Shabaab with one having only a minor injury. Israeli Special Forces were soon on the scene and were said to be assisting Kenyan troops in battling the Al Shabaab guerrillas. Some Kenyans, inside and outside the government, said Israeli security was permitted to run the operation against Al Shabaab terrorists at the mall. Israel maintains a heavy military, financial, and intelligence presence in Kenya. The nephew of Uhuru Kenyatta, along with his fiancée, were killed in the attack, along with French, British, Canadian, Peruvian, Dutch nationals, as well as a Ghanaian diplomat were killed in the attack.

Ruto successfully sought and received an adjournment of the ICC trial so that he could return to Kenya from The Hague to handle the Westgate terrorist attack. Many African leaders, including Yoweri Museveni, the President of Uganda; Attorney General of Tanzania Frederick Mwita; Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn of Ethiopia; and the foreign ministers of Rwanda, Burundi, and Eritrea have complained that the ICC trials of Ruto and the planned trial of Kenyatta in November are harming Kenya. Adding insult to injury, Obama bypassed Kenya on his recent trip to Africa, choosing to stop in Tanzania instead of the nation of his father’s birth, a clear vote of no confidence in Kenya and a signal to Al Shabaab in neighboring Somalia that Kenya does not have the support of the United States.

The ICC proceedings against Kenyan officials are considered a joke in Kenya and elsewhere in Africa. There have been charges by African leaders that the ICC is «hunting» African leaders. Ruto and former radio journalist Joshua arap Sang have asked the ICC to transfer jurisdiction for the trial to Kenya but the Soros R2P gang has adamantly refused, even rejecting a request by the African Union to transfer the proceedings to either Kenya or Tanzania. Some prosecution witnesses have been found to be frauds. 

Former ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo, who originally brought the genocide charges against Kenyatta, Ruto, and four others, himself stands accused of rape in South Africa and protecting pedophiles in Argentina. Ocampo pursued Kenyan leaders with a peculiar zeal and the support of Obama and his R2P aficionados. But, so far, the ICC has failed to get a single conviction. In addition, Ocampo's Wikipedia entry has been purged of any negative information from his past in Argentina and his sexual indiscretions in South Africa.

Kenyan Industrializtion Minister Henry Kogsei, Cabinet Secretary Francis Mauthara, and Police Commissioner Mohammed Hussein Ali, three of the Ocampo’s indicted Kenyans, who all became known as the «Ocampo Six», were acquitted. The pending cases against Ruto, Kenyatta, and Sang are as weak as those brought against those acquitted. Ocampo's deputy prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda of Gambia, succeeded Ocampo as chief prosecutor in 2012. Bensouda been an apologist for her nation's dictatorial president Yahya Jammeh. Because of Bensouda’s own zeal in prosecuting Ruto, Kenyatta, and Sang, they are now called the «Bensouda Three».

Secretary of State John Kerry recently hosted Somalia’s self-declared president Hussein Sheik Mohamed in Washington. Mohamed is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood in Somalia, which, in turn, has connections to Al Shabaab. Kerry elicited strong support from Mohamed for the Obama administration's support for Syrian rebels, including Al Qaeda linked rebels known to be allied with Al Shabab. Mohamed seeks to expand Islamist influence in Somalia to the more secular autonomist region of Puntland and the independent Republic of Somaliland, which has been separated from Somalia since 1991, in a «federal framework». There is no indication anywhere in the world that any radical Islamists favor federalism in any form but, instead, total submission to a radical Islamist «ummah» or nation operating under the most radical interpretations of sharia law. Al Shabaab’s peculiar brand of Islam was on display in the Westgate Mall when they asked shoppers to name the Prophet Mohammed’s mother or recite a well-known Muslim prayer in Arabic. If the shopper was unable to answer the questions posed, he or she was shot to death instantly.

]]>