The arrest Thursday of Julian Assange eviscerates all pretense of the rule of law and the rights of a free press. The illegalities, embraced by the Ecuadorian, British and U.S. governments, in the seizure of Assange are ominous. They presage a world where the internal workings, abuses, corruption, lies and crimes, especially war crimes, carried out by corporate states and the global ruling elite will be masked from the public. They presage a world where those with the courage and integrity to expose the misuse of power will be hunted down, tortured, subjected to sham trials and given lifetime prison terms in solitary confinement. They presage an Orwellian dystopia where news is replaced with propaganda, trivia and entertainment. The arrest of Assange, I fear, marks the official beginning of the corporate totalitarianism that will define our lives.

Under what law did Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno capriciously terminate Julian Assange’s rights of asylum as a political refugee? Under what law did Moreno authorize British police to enter the Ecuadorian Embassy—diplomatically sanctioned sovereign territory—to arrest a naturalized citizen of Ecuador? Under what law did Prime Minister Theresa May order the British police to grab Assange, who has never committed a crime? Under what law did President Donald Trump demand the extradition of Assange, who is not a U.S. citizen and whose news organization is not based in the United States?

I am sure government attorneys are skillfully doing what has become de rigueur for the corporate state, using specious legal arguments to eviscerate enshrined rights by judicial fiat. This is how we have the right to privacy with no privacy. This is how we have “free” elections funded by corporate money, covered by a compliant corporate media and under iron corporate control. This is how we have a legislative process in which corporate lobbyists write the legislation and corporate-indentured politicians vote it into law. This is how we have the right to due process with no due process. This is how we have a government—whose fundamental responsibility is to protect citizens—that orders and carries out the assassination of its own citizens such as the radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki and his 16-year-old son. This is how we have a press legally permitted to publish classified information and a publisher sitting in jail in Britain awaiting extradition to the United States and a whistleblower, Chelsea Manning, in a jail cell in the United States.

Britain will use as its legal cover for the arrest the extradition request from Washington based on conspiracy charges. This legal argument, in a functioning judiciary, would be thrown out of court. Unfortunately, we no longer have a functioning judiciary. We will soon know if Britain as well lacks one.

Assange was granted asylum in the embassy in 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden to answer questions about sexual offense allegations that were eventually dropped. Assange and his lawyers always argued that if he was put in Swedish custody he would be extradited to the United States. Once he was granted asylum and Ecuadorian citizenship the British government refused to grant Assange safe passage to the London airport, trapping him in the embassy for seven years as his health steadily deteriorated.

The Trump administration will seek to try Assange on charges that he conspired with Manning in 2010 to steal the Iraq and Afghanistan war logs obtained by WikiLeaks. The half a million internal documents leaked by Manning from the Pentagon and the State Department, along with the 2007 video of U.S. helicopter pilots nonchalantly gunning down Iraqi civilians, including children, and two Reuters journalists, provided copious evidence of the hypocrisy, indiscriminate violence, and routine use of torture, lies, bribery and crude tactics of intimidation by the U.S. government in its foreign relations and wars in the Middle East. Assange and WikiLeaks allowed us to see the inner workings of empire—the most important role of a press—and for this they became empire’s prey.

U.S. government lawyers will attempt to separate WikiLeaks and Assange from The New York Times and the British newspaper The Guardian, both of which also published the leaked material from Manning, by implicating Assange in the theft of the documents. Manning was repeatedly and often brutally pressured during her detention and trial to implicate Assange in the seizure of the material, something she steadfastly refused to do. She is currently in jail because of her refusal to testify, without her lawyer, in front of the grand jury assembled for the Assange case. President Barack Obama granted Manning, who was given a 35-year sentence, clemency after she served seven years in a military prison.

Once the documents and videos provided by Manning to Assange and WikiLeaks were published and disseminated by news organizations such as The New York Times and The Guardian, the press callously, and foolishly, turned on Assange. News organizations that had run WikiLeaks material over several days soon served as conduits in a black propaganda campaign to discredit Assange and WikiLeaks. This coordinated smear campaign was detailed in a leaked Pentagon document prepared by the Cyber Counterintelligence Assessments Branch and dated March 8, 2008. The document called on the U.S. to eradicate the “feeling of trust” that is WikiLeaks’ “center of gravity” and destroy Assange’s reputation.

Assange, who with the Manning leaks had exposed the war crimes, lies and criminal manipulations of the George W. Bush administration, soon earned the ire of the Democratic Party establishment by publishing 70,000 hacked emails belonging to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and senior Democratic officials. The emails were copied from the accounts of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman. The Podesta emails exposed the donation of millions of dollars from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, two of the major funders of Islamic State, to the Clinton Foundation. It exposed the $657,000 that Goldman Sachs paid to Hillary Clinton to give talks, a sum so large it can only be considered a bribe. It exposed Clinton’s repeated mendacity. She was caught in the emails, for example, telling the financial elites that she wanted “open trade and open borders” and believed Wall Street executives were best positioned to manage the economy, a statement that contradicted her campaign statements. It exposed the Clinton campaign’s efforts to influence the Republican primaries to ensure that Trump was the Republican nominee. It exposed Clinton’s advance knowledge of questions in a primary debate. It exposed Clinton as the primary architect of the war in Libya, a war she believed would burnish her credentials as a presidential candidate. Journalists can argue that this information, like the war logs, should have remained hidden, but they can’t then call themselves journalists.

The Democratic leadership, intent on blaming Russia for its election loss, charges that the Podesta emails were obtained by Russian government hackers, although James Comey, the former FBI director, has conceded that the emails were probably delivered to WikiLeaks by an intermediary. Assange has said the emails were not provided by “state actors.”

WikiLeaks has done more to expose the abuses of power and crimes of the American Empire than any other news organization. In addition to the war logs and the Podesta emails, it made public the hacking tools used by the CIA and the National Security Agency and their interference in foreign elections, including in the French elections. It disclosed the internal conspiracy against British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn by Labour members of Parliament. It intervened to save Edward Snowden, who made public the wholesale surveillance of the American public by our intelligence agencies, from extradition to the United States by helping him flee from Hong Kong to Moscow. The Snowden leaks also revealed that Assange was on a U.S. “manhunt target list.”

A haggard-looking Assange, as he was dragged out of the embassy by British police, shook his finger and shouted: “The U.K. must resist this attempt by the Trump administration. … The U.K. must resist!”

We all must resist. We must, in every way possible, put pressure on the British government to halt the judicial lynching of Assange. If Assange is extradited and tried, it will create a legal precedent that will terminate the ability of the press, which Trump repeatedly has called “the enemy of the people,” to hold power accountable. The crimes of war and finance, the persecution of dissidents, minorities and immigrants, the pillaging by corporations of the nation and the ecosystem and the ruthless impoverishment of working men and women to swell the bank accounts of the rich and consolidate the global oligarchs’ total grip on power will not only expand, but will no longer be part of public debate. First Assange. Then us.

truthdig.com

After enlisting in 2007, Manning was a private first class in the US Army, an intelligence analyst with the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division, a rapid reaction force, and was part of the occupation contingent in Iraq. He was arrested at the end of May 2010 after being denounced by hacker Adrian Lamo and was retained in custody without charge for more than two months at the American military base Camp Arifjan (Kuwait), after which he was taken back to the US, where he was placed in solitary confinement on the pretext of possible suicide. 

Eyewitnesses who saw Manning after his arrest repeated time and again that they were concerned about the prisoner’s mental health as a result of the constant humiliation and pressure he was subjected to in prison. The reason: Bradley Manning handed over hundreds of thousands of documents on military crimes and incidents in the wars unleashed by the US in Afghanistan and Iraq (such as the now famous video of Americans shooting Iraqi civilians from the air), a file on crimes committed in secret American prisons and nearly 250,000 US State Department diplomatic cables to WikiLeaks to be published. 

It is a fundamental moment. The US military court found Manning guilty on virtually all counts except the most serious – «aiding the enemy». The private was complete cleared of this charge, which is a capital offence. The former United States Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs Philip Crowley, in a speech he gave at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on 10 March 2011, was forced to admit: «What is happening with Manning is ridiculous and counterproductive. I don’t know why the Department of Defense is doing it» (three days after this declaration, the State Department official had to hand in his resignation).

American and European human rights defenders and politicians proposed Manning for the Nobel Peace Prize on several occasions between 2011 and 2012. On the last occasion he was put forward by the Oklahoma Center for Conscience and Peace Research in America and Icelandic parliamentarians. They maintain that following the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2011, the US authorities have been using legislation on espionage to commit «actions forbidden by international law and American legislation». 

Canadian scholars point out that previous US legislation on espionage was only used against «spies and traitors, not whistle-blowers» and yet «President Obama has used the Espionage Act to prosecute more whistle-blowers than all prior administrations combined». 

In actual fact, it is impossible to classify Manning as a spy for another country or a traitor to the national interests of the US. He only produced documentary evidence so that what was «secret» is known by all. The fact that Manning’s actions were guided by the intention to prevent fatal consequences being suffered by mankind as a result of some of the actions of America’s political and military leadership that break moral standards and violate laws is shown, amongst other things, in an entry in his private chat log in which he said he hoped the material would lead to: «hopefully worldwide discussion, debates, and reforms. if not… than [sic] we’re doomed as a species».

And so an American court was unable to find Manning guilty of «aiding the enemy», which in this instance is what the entire global community is turning into for the US government. At the same time, the Manning case and its verdict, alongside the persecution of Edward Snowden and WikiLeaks creator Julian Assange, are a warning that the US authorities are sending out to anyone bent on letting their fellow citizens and the world know the truth about the dark sides of «globalisation American-style». 

According to Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty and National Security Program and a senior lawyer at the New York University School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice: «Manning is one of very few people ever charged under the Espionage Act prosecutions for leaks to the media… Despite the lack of any evidence that he intended any harm to the United States, Manning faces decades in prison. It is a very scary precedent».

Meanwhile, Amnesty International is certain that the conviction of Bradley Manning is an open indication of «the irresponsibility of US authorities». In a statement on the organisation’s official website it states: «While Manning could face more than a century behind bars, numerous high-level officials have never faced even the threat of investigations – in effect they have been let off scot-free. No criminal charges have ever been made in relation to the US secret detention programme where enforced disappearance and torture were authorized at the highest level of government. Details of the programme remain classified».

The main message of the Manning trial can be boiled down to the following: 

A) Any US citizen taking it upon himself to say and prove that the authorities in his country are committing crimes when they shoot innocent civilians and journalists, detain and torture thousands of prisoners in secret prisons, and place under total control and surveillance the citizens of its own and other countries may end up in prison for the rest of his life. 

B) The system does not only cover up the real criminals and law breakers, it offers them the opportunity to break the law even further. This is also recognised by members of human rights organisations in the West: «The government’s priorities are upside down. The US government has refused to investigate credible allegations of torture and other crimes under international law despite overwhelming evidence. Yet they decided to prosecute Manning who it seems was trying to do the right thing – reveal credible evidence of unlawful behaviour by the government».

There are two key reasons for the conviction of the former US Army private who attempted to warn of the threat to the world being caused by «globalisation American-style»:

1) The annoyance of the US government because of loss of reputation – after all, Manning produced documentary evidence of violations being committed by the US authorities of both the constitution of their own country and international law. 

2) The need to adopt coercive measures to curtail US occupation troops abroad. According to American researchers, following the disclosure of documents on tortures and atrocities in the Iraqi branches of the American GULAG and the actions of the US military, which directly fall within the scope of the Geneva Convention under the definition «war crimes», even the puppet authorities in Iraq have refused to guarantee the safety of American soldiers committing crimes against innocent civilians in their country.

«Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden are people who were not afraid to go against the authorities in order to bring justice to the world», declared British Labour Party politician and MP Jeremy Corbyn. And that is the point. Nobody owns the monopoly on truth. It is a common heritage of mankind. The truth expressed by Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning has shown mankind the true face of «Pax Americana».