Small farmer quotes
Food Inc 
		Destroying small farmers
See: Food Inc quotes
Believed they had attained total control over the 
people; they were dismayed to find their plans threatened by the stubborn 
independence of the small farmers, the kulaks. Stalin ordered the OGPU to seize 
all food and animals of the kulaks, and to starve them out. The Chicago American 
Feb. 25, 1935 carried a front page headline, "SIX MILLION PERISH IN SOVIET 
FAMINE: Peasants' Crops Seized, They and their Animals Starve". To draw 
attention from this atrocity, it was later alleged that the Germans, not the 
Soviets, had killed six million people, the number taken from the Chicago 
American headline by a Chicago publicist.
    The Communist Party, the Party of 
the Peasants and Workers, exterminated the peasants and enslaved the workers. 
Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be their biggest 
stumbling block. The French Reign of Terror was directed, not against the 
aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic to it, but against the small farmers 
who refused to turn over their grain to the revolutionary tribunals in exchange 
for the worthless assignats.
    In the United States, the 
foundations are presently engaged in the same type of war of extermination 
against the American farmer. The traditional formula of land plus labor for the 
farmer has been altered due to the farmer's need for purchasing power, to buy 
industrial goods needed in his farming operations. Because of this need for 
capital, the farmer is especially vulnerable to the World Order's manipulation 
of interest rates, which is bankrupting him.
    Just as in the Soviet Union, in the 
early 1930s, when Stalin ordered the kulaks to give up their small plots of land 
to live and work on the collective farms, the American small farmer faces the 
same type of extermination, being forced to give up his small plot of land to 
become a hired hand for the big agricultural soviets or trusts. The Brookings 
Institution and other foundations originated the monetary programs implemented 
by the Federal Reserve System to destroy the American farmer, a replay of the 
Soviet tragedy in Russia, with the one proviso that the farmer will be allowed 
to survive if he becomes a slave worker of the giant trusts.
[1984] The World Order Our Secret Ruler
by Eustace Mullins
The final statement on the Federal Reserve Board’s causing the Agricultural Depression of 1920-21 was made by William Jennings Bryan. In "Hearst’s Magazine" of November, 1923, he wrote: "The Federal Reserve Bank that should have been the farmer’s greatest protection has become his greatest foe. The deflation of the farmer was a crime deliberately committed." CHAPTER NINE The Agricultural Depression [SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE By Eustace Mullins]
One of the principal but little known operations of the 
Rockefeller Foundation has been its techniques for controlling world 
agriculture. Its director, Kenneth Wernimont, set up Rockefeller controlled 
agricultural programs throughout Mexico and Latin America. The independent 
farmer is a great threat to the World Order, because he produces for himself, 
and because his produce can be converted into capital, which gives him 
independence. In Soviet Russia, the Bolsheviks believed they had 
attained total control over the people; they were dismayed to find their plans 
threatened by the stubborn independence of the small farmers, the Kulaks. 
    Stalin ordered the OGPU to seize 
all food and animals of the Kulaks, and to starve them out. The Chicago 
American, February 25, 1935 carried a front page headline, SIX MILLION PERISH IN 
SOVIET FAMINE; Peasants' Crops Seized, They and their Animals Starve. To draw 
attention from this atrocity, it was later alleged that the Germans, not the 
Soviets, had killed six million people, the number taken from the Chicago 
American headline by a Chicago publicist. 
    The Communist Party, the Party of 
the Peasants and Workers, exterminated the peasants and enslaved the workers. 
Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be their biggest 
stumbling block. The French Reign of Terror was directed, not against the 
aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic to it, but against the small farmers 
who refused to turn over their grain to the revolutionary tribunals in exchange 
for the worthless assignats. In the United States, the foundations are 
presently engaged in the same type of war of extermination against the American 
farmer. 
    The traditional formula of land 
plus labor for the farmer has been altered due to the farmer's need for 
purchasing power, to buy industrial goods needed in his farming operations. 
Because of this need for capital, the farmer is especially vulnerable to the 
World Order's manipulation of interest rates, which is bankrupting him. Just as 
in the Soviet Union, in the early 1930s, when Stalin ordered the Kulaks to give 
up their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms, the 
American small farmer faces the same type of extermination, being forced to give 
up his small plot of land to become a hired hand for the big agricultural 
trusts. The Brookings Institution and other foundations originated the 
monetary programs implemented by the Federal Reserve System to destroy the 
American farmer, a replay of the Soviet tragedy in Russia, with one proviso that 
the farmer will be allowed to survive if he becomes a slave worker of the giant 
trusts. Tavistock The Best Kept Secret 
in America By Dr. Byron T. Weeks, MD
[The Future of Food - Fake 
Foods] Investigative Reporter, Pam Killeen interviews 
Deborah Garcia about her new movie, The Future of Food.
If these genetically engineered seeds blow onto a farmer’s field, Monsanto could 
come on their field, test their crops, demand money from them and claim 
ownership of the crops. The farmer, who probably doesn't want to have 
genetically engineered seeds anywhere near his field, now has this 
responsibility. It’s a very strange situation. It seems like Monsanto has all 
the power and that they don't have any accountability or responsibility. If 
contamination occurs on an innocent neighboring farm, somehow the innocent 
farmer has to pay for the contamination. It’s illogical. This is now the way 
that the system is working. It’s the opposite from what you would imagine..............
    in order to determine whether or not these crops would 
be regulated, both the government and the biotech industry decided that these 
seeds would be considered “substantially equivalent” to normal seeds. This is
simply not true. The reason why they came up with this 
determination was so that GE foods wouldn't have to be regulated, tested nor 
labeled. 
    ...One future is industrial 
pesticides, chemical laden, tasteless food that is heavily processed, controlled 
by huge multinational corporations for their own benefit; the other future is 
exemplified by organic farmers who farm and feed people regionally with good 
healthy food that people can feel safe eating and eat in a sense of community 
and family. If people really understood what was happening to our food supply, 
they would choose good, safe, healthy food grown by a local farmer. If we choose 
to eat this way, we will also benefit by supporting local economies.