Socialism
Shadow government
"To the Rockefellers, socialism is not a system for redistributing wealth - especially not for redistributing their wealth -but a system to control people and competitors. Socialism puts power in the hands of the government. And since the Rockefellers control the government, government control means Rockefeller control. You may not have known this, but you can be sure they do!" ...The Rockefeller File by Gary Allen
Control necessitates a static society. A growing, competitive, and free
society gives new people a chance to make their fortune and replace some of
those already at the top. So legislation is promoted to restrict entrepreneurial
effort and tax away capital accumulations not protected in the tax-free
foundations of the Establishment insiders. Every effort is made to press
medium-size business to the wall and allow it to be swallowed up by the
Establishment giants......But the fact is that
socialism is only a system for control, and the members of the Establishment
elite operating out of New York and Washington understand socialism much better
than do the Marxists....... the Establishment insiders
know that socialism is not a humanitarian system for redistributing wealth, but
a system for concentrating wealth and controlling people. Socialism is nothing
more or less than a power system -- a power system with quasi-mystical and
demonstrably false philosophical premises.
The suggestions of the Trilateral report, "The Crisis of Democracy," are just
about the most cultured and genteel proposals for socialist dictatorship I've
ever seen. Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, and Mao are illiterate boors by comparison.
The great international bankers and industrialists do not favor competition.
What they favor is the formation of cartels and monopolies to control world
finance, markets, and natural resources. The Communists, led by the Soviet
Union, have basically identical goals on the level of world power. What is more
natural than for the Western monopolists to divvy up these spheres with the
Communist monopolists of the East? There is a great deal more to it than that,
but I think I've made my point. An Interview with Gary Allen by John Rees