Spurious MMR Study Purposefully Provides No Autism Answers
Archives of Disease in Childhood 
Letter To The Editor
7 February 2008
What does this 
study test, and why? 
Autism parent 
Dear Editor 
Of the original 1770 Special Educational Needs (SEN) cases in this study [1], 
255 were Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Of the 1770 735 dropped out, then a 
further 780 were excluded for reasons which are not transparent. 255 were left 
(a different 255 from before): some ASD, some just SEN but we do not know in 
what proportion. Then, exactly 100 were excluded because of inadequate blood 
tests. Of the remainder 101 had ASD (less the 40 per cent of the original 255 
autistic cases). None is reported to have bowel disease (the sub-group of 
Wakefield's study) or adverse reaction to MMR. 
It is not clear what the scientific purpose of this study is. The study states 
"We did not obtain gut mucosal samples for ethical reasons". It would, of 
course, be unethical to obtain gut biopsies from cases without gut symptoms, and 
since none of the cases in the study had gut symptoms there would be no grounds 
for subjecting them to such invasive treatment. This, of course, makes this a 
distinct group from the children referred to Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues 
at the Paediatric Gastroenterology department of the Royal Free Hospital in the 
1990s and slighlty beyond. 
In this regard it is worth noting the recent warning of the National Autistic 
Society (NAS): 
"The National Autistic Society is keenly aware of the concerns of parents 
surrounding suggested links between autism and the MMR vaccine. The charity is 
concerned that the GMC hearing, and surrounding media coverage, will create 
further confusion and make it even more difficult for parents to access 
appropriate medical advice for their children. 
"It is particularly important that this case is not allowed to increase the lack 
of sympathy that some parents of children with autism have encountered from 
health professionals, particularly on suspected gut and bowel problems. Parents 
have reported to the NAS that in some cases their concerns have been dismissed 
as hysteria following previous publicity around the MMR vaccine. It is crucial 
that health professionals listen to parents' concerns and respect their views as 
the experts on their individual children. 
"There is an urgent need for further, authoritative research into the causes of 
autism, to improve our understanding of the condition, to respond to parents' 
concerns and to enable us to ensure that there are appropriate services and 
support in place to meet people's needs." [2] 
There is presently not enough consensus about the etiology of ASD to assume 
there is any single origin, nor anything to rule out ASD subjects having gut 
symptoms which justify on occasion invasive procedures. The NAS apparently 
consider that there is a sub-group which is being denied sympathy, investigation 
or treatment, and this is in itself troubling. It also suggests that this study 
is not representative since no such cases are included, and it does not address 
their problems. 
The NAS warning relates to the GMC hearing involving doctors Wakefield, 
Walker-Smith and Murch which is set to resume on 25 March approaching. I do not 
think it is being unduly cynical to query the publication of this study at the 
present time as a media event, bearing in mind that it seems to have been 
carried out five or six years ago. Moreover, the study has once again been 
promoted as refuting the Wakefield hypothesis when it in fact tests for a 
possibility that had not been proposed. Meanwhile, the plight of autistic 
children with gastro-intestinal symptoms is excluded both from the study and 
public attention, as if they did not exist. The NAS statement warned of 
"creating further confusion" and this is precisely what this study and its media 
exposure has done. 
John Stone 
References: 
[1] Gillian Baird, Andrew Pickles, Emily Simonoff, Tony Charman, Peter Sullivan, 
Susie Chandler, Tom Loucas, David Meldrum, Muhammed Afzal, Brenda Thomas, Li 
Jin, and David Brown, Measles vaccination and antibody response in autism 
spectrum disorders Arch Dis Child 2008; 0: adc.2007.122937v1 
[2] General 
Medical Council hearing against Dr Andrew Wakefield
**************** 
For Further Information:
For the full text of this spurious, elderly, very small study currently being 
propagandised by the UK Department of Health in order to attempt to ensure that 
the links between child vaccination and autism are never properly studied and 
researched, see
Measles vaccination and antibody response in autism spectrum disorders autism 
spectrum disorders, G. Baird et al, Arch Dis Child 
doi:10.1136/adc.2007.122937