Midgley
	Wikipedia
[Midgley 
is a semi-anonymous Allopathic
gatekeeper who 
seems to spend most of his time on medical politics--in other words: suppressing 
the truth, alternative medicine, and any criticism of Allopathy, on Wikipedia.  He is a master of the spurious 
reason for deleting pages, text, and links he doesn't like. A fine example, 
right before your eyes, of the 100 year Allopathic 
suppression of non-pharma medicine & health/disease knowledge.]
User:Leifern/Accusations 
by Midgley
Deleting 
text
Here on the page he created called 
anti-vaccinationists, 
he deleted 4 quotes by anti vax people [ref]. 
Even after he had put a reply to each one.  
Harassment of alt med editors using RFCs
One way  Midgley can get at non-Allopathic editors (outnumbered 
20 to 1) is to creat RFCs (ref,
ref).  Then numerous medical people come in vote against.
Link 
deletion excuse. 
Even though whale has the orginal books on line [See: 
	Smallpox 
	vax books] Midgley is using spurious reasons 
to delete links to those books.
[ref]
You can 
Deletions
Assemblage Point
[46], 
Peter Fletcher
[47] 
Richard Shulze [ref]
Deletion attempts
Boyd Hayley
[ref] 
Robert Mendelsohn
[ref], 
Autism epidemic [Deletion page]
Making out vaccine critics are 
cranks/insane ['Anti-vaccine is a pejorative term.]
 This vaccinator created the 
Anti-vaccinationist 
page on Wikipedia so he could control that page and also make out anti-vaccine 
people are cranks (the term, like cranks, is pejorative), which he demonstrated 
by linking the page to the crank page 
[ref] 
[ref].  Anti-vaccinists is 
a term that fell out of use for this reason.  Now he is attempting to 
delete by merger  Beddow 
Bayly,
Viera Scheibner,
National Anti-Vaccination League, into this page. 
So you can see this page 
National Anti-Vaccination League vanish into
this piece.  
Bear in mind they DELETED a very similar page called Vaccine critics
[13] which, get this, is now directed to his 
Anti-vaccine page! Check it out
Vaccination critics!!
You can see his thinking: I write as someone who 
treats a small number of psychotic patients, and therefore might come from 
someone psychotic or a group simulating psychosis for their own amusement. 
(John's writing is not very closely similar, one may have an idée fixée without 
being mad even in a lay sense)).[ref]
[ref]  Psychotic is 
Allopathic for forbidden thinking/beliefs [See:
Terminology]
Please also see here (emphasis added) the use of "anti-vaccinationist" as a 
pejorative term "For your work against quacks, viz. anti-vaccinationists 
and others, I award you this picture of Sir William Osler and three 
colleagues!" [[10]]
The Spurious reasons. 
Richard Schulze (naturopath) [deletion 
ref]. [Richard Shulze is one of the best Natural Healers. See 
    Dr Richard Shulze]
Delete unless verified - it has had a verify tag and comments on it since 
January, and no action has occurred, and it is now high in the Google ranking 
for this subject.
Midgley 
13:41, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Autism epidemic  
Deletion page [There is one but they still deny it due to the vaccine 
cause.]
This article has a name which gives a clue to its troubles. If it had been 
called "Autism (Incidence)" or "Autism (Incidence and reporting)" then it could 
have been a discussion on a sub-topic of
Autism. As it 
is, it is a brawl, hath little of structure or consensus and is not - looking at 
the long history in the talk page - getting better over time. There is actually 
a topic worth writing an article about, but that isn't the topic and this isn't 
the article, and it never will become that from here. Delete, and start from 
scratch, and get someone to volunteer to write it who is noted for NPOV, before 
the rest of the editing process gets going.
Midgley 
22:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Boyd Hayley 
Deletion page. [Most notable independent scientist on
thimerosal, the vaccine ingredient.  See
here.] 
"Another not-a-biography page with disreputable 
references, toxic hyperbole, buzz phrases "50% Mercury by weight". It is
Thimerosal controversy being re-written along with conspiracy theorising, 
Gulf War syndrome and
WP:OWN by the 
usual author, Ombudsman. An academic Chemist with not a single published paper 
referred to in the article. Not notable, at least, on nothing like this basis. 
Not WP:BIO Not 
good." 'Speedy DELETE
Midgley 
00:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Robert S. Mendelsohn [Deletion 
page. Most notable anti-vaccine medical doctor of 20 century. See
here.] 
"This is not a useful page about an interesting person. The authors are 
mainly noted for efforts to present poorly reasoned attacks on vaccination in a 
wide and inappropriate variety of articles. The Quackwatch commentary linked 
from the page is informative."--Midgley 
01:37, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Assemblage_point  [Deletion 
page. See here.]
"Delete This has the appearance of an advertisment. The names seem 
too close to be coincidental, and the site link and book link seem likely to be 
closely related to the author's benefit. The coloured light stuff is quackery, 
but that of itself is not suggested to be the reason for deletion."
Midgley 
02:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Peter_Fletcher 
Deletion page. [Rare ex-government
critic of MMR vaccine]
"POV non WP:BIO. Not encyclopaedic. There are very 
very many retired civil service doctors in England and the only thing adduced 
about him is that he was to have been one witness in a trial which will not 
occur since the legal aid board determined it had no chance at all of success. 
Basically this is yet another attack page on immunisation presented as a 
biography - possibly we should decide that these are speedy delete candidates. 
DELETE."
Midgley 
10:27, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Keep - this is just another attempt by Midgley to remove information 
that is inconvenient for his opinion. Midgley has been on Wikipedia a short 
time, but has a consistent record of personal attacks, borderline vandalism, 
malicious sockpuppetry and impersonation. --Leifern 
13:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 
William_Job_Collins [Deletion 
page. Notable anti-vaccine medical man.
See.]
"nn (there are currently 100 000 doctors practicing in 
the UK of whom more could be gleaned from The Medical Register than is here - 
"he was a doctor who worked with two other doctors, and did not use a particular 
treatment. His father also was a doctor and did not use that treatment". The 
links are to a clonelet of the author's whale.to website which has been 
determined by RFC to be not
WP:RS - the site 
in question was established after whale.to ceased getting links from WP. This is 
one of many nn articles generally lacking in interest and
WP:V and by
User:Whaleto in pursuit of his
WP:SOAPBOX 
WP:VSCA."   
Midgley 
09:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Alan Cantwell. [One of the main bogey men to Allopathy, see 
	Cantwell, M.D.]
Midgley is behind this one.
Assorted text and link deletions
Removing text re measles
[57] Deleting whale.to link
[58]
Here he has removed thimerosal info
[61]
Another editor taking exception to be labelled anti-vaccine
[62]
Midgley 3 hrs
[49]
Spurious reason for deleting Nexus article:
[50] 1 minute reader reason for deleting National Anti Vaccine League!
[51]
Deletion 'by merger' attempts 
He tried to delete the main medical anti-vaccinator of the last century
Robert Mendelsohn
[59], Now he is attempting to delete by merger
Beddow 
Bayly,
Viera Scheibner,
National Anti-Vaccination League, into a page he created with his POV
Anti-vaccinationists. 
	
		
			
				What you wrote in my user discussion page violated WP. I trust 
				that you will not do so again in the future. And I expect no 
				"Invisible Anon" vandalism. Thank you.
					- Incorrect.
					
					User:jgwlaw, but take it to RFC if you won't take 
					advice.
					
					Midgley 04:23, 4 April 2006 (UTC) 
					
						- Is that a threat? Are you a self-proclaimed guardian 
						of Wikopedia? Your "advice" was insulting and incorrect. 
						
 
					
					 
				
				
					- 
					
						- Further, you may not like what I and others have 
						written on Breast Implants, but what we have stated is 
						correct. Both I and the other author have either 
						epidemiology or scientific background. What we have 
						stated is not what it appears you like to call "pseudo 
						science", unless you call anything you disagree with 
						Pseudo-science. 
 
					
					 
				
				See user page. Signing comments is not regarded as optional.
				
				Midgley 07:55, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
				Fine. I intended to sign. I will sign this.
				
				Jgwlaw 12:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC) And you need to know that I 
				will not toleate your following me around with insults.
				
				Jgwlaw 12:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)