As a rough guideline, administrators usually require editors to have made more than 500 useful non-botlike edits, and to have been active in the last thirty days. Patrollers and License reviewers don't have to request this flag. Find possible candidates.
@Sean9064: I've added the template to the file so you can now overwrite it. As far as your request for the autopatroller right, your edit count is too low right now. Abzeronow (talk) 16:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Please come back later when you have demonstrated some more experience and made more edits than what is required. ─ Aafī(talk)19:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to upload able to upload higher resolution versions of existing files. I have repeatedly seen low-res images and found out that higher resolution versions were available at the stated source. Thank you. SiMon (talk) 18:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm requesting rollback rights to assist with the increasing amount of counter-vandalism I'm doing on this project. I have several months of experience with the tool on the English Wikipedia and a few more doing cross-wiki counter-vandalism work. I have read the rollback guideline and will follow it in good faith to the best of my ability. Let me know if you have any questions! (please ping me on reply, thanks!) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As a rough guideline, administrators usually require editors to have made at least 1,000 useful, non-botlike edits or a large amount of justified renaming requests at Commons before they will consider granting the filemover right.
As a military archivist, I regularly see many files incorrectly named - ranging from basic typos, incorrect military units or terminology - right through to the obviously meaningless or ambiguous names. I have made a significant number of rename requests, and to the best of my knowledge, have never had a rename request rejected. However, I am aware that I might sometimes overload current filemovers (I sometimes see backlogs), so I would be happy to take on the role myself. Thank you. Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 11:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wait I just declined several renaming requests, they were not completely wrong but not fully appropriate either. This person is probably a good candidate but I feel it's a bit too early. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting Filemover status on Commons. I have made over 1,500 edits on Commons and 2,000 on Wikipedia. I am an experienced editor and have a good understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I would like to be able to move files to correct names and to help with file maintenance tasks. Specifically, I am wanting to rename a lot of Minnesota map files to have a consistent naming scheme. Thank you. Svenskbygderna (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any recent renaming requests. (I also will note that I just granted you the autopatroller right). So you might want to show the need for the file moving tool. Abzeronow (talk) 17:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I plan to use this right to move the meaningless files in cat:Harbin. I made over 1000 edits in commons and I was a filemover in zhwiki before it canceled this right. Thank you. Hehua (talk) 15:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't usually make decisions on filemover requests (since I have less familiarity with that). I'm not seeing any recent renaming requests here on Commons. I'll wait a little longer (at least a few more days) to see if anyone else weighs in. Abzeronow (talk) 18:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]