
Naive radicals may be tricked by spooky journalists into thinking:
The spooky journalists want the Palestinians to be weak and divided.
The spooky journalists want to aid the Islamists who keep the Palestinians weak.
(David Rose - disinformation agent?)
Of course, Fatah is not all good.
And Hamas is not all bad.
But Fatah, so far, has been the Palestininians best hope for creating a viable state.
Hamas has worked in the interests of Israel.
Although a lot of clever propaganda has disguised this fact.

On 18 August 2009, at haaretz.com/ there was an excellent article by Nehemia Shtrasler about how Israel wrecked Arafat, crowned Hamas, and gave birth to Al-Qaida in Gaza
The article argues:

4. Nehemia Shtrasler writes:
1 comment:
Mind you, Hamas is tight with Hezbollah and Hezbollah strikes me as the real deal. Hassan Nasrallah, same same. It strikes me that between Hamas and Fatah, the former is less quisling-like, if you know what I mean. Mind you, did Hamas offer any resistance in the latest Gaza slaughter? How come they only managed to kill a dozen Israelis? Did they learn nothing from Hezbollah?
Anyway confused now...
Post a Comment