

Lily Gaubert

Lily Gaubert

Lily Gaubert or Allison Wyatt


Lily Gaubert

Allison Wyatt or Lily Gaubert

Allison Wyatt. Website for this image

Above is logo for CEOP - Child exploitation and Online Protection

Lamb Chops

Saul Alinsky (left)
Anonymous referred us to Saul Alinsky.
Saul Alinsky's 12 Rules for Radicals | Best of Beck
Biographer Sanford Horwitt has claimed that Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign was influenced by Alinsky's teachings.[22]
"In a way, he was the Ayn Rand of the socialist movement.

The University of Chicago's Leo Strauss.

Frank Nitti
"Alinksy was allowed complete access to the gang, including its financial secrets."
Alinsky wrote 12 Rules for Radicals.
So, how might Alinsky's 'rules' help Obama and the Chicago Mafia?

.jpg)
"Strauss thinks that a political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat."

The University of Chicago's Leo Strauss.
Strauss believed that "those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality and that there is only one natural right – the right of the superior to rule over the inferior."
Rulers need to go in for "perpetual deception."
Following Machiavelli, he maintained that if no external threat exists then one has to be manufactured.
"Perpetual war, not perpetual peace, is what Straussians believe in."
Anonymous left this comment:
With reference to Strauss / Kotb video, there is some more information in that area which is relevant and non-conspiracy.
Strauss had an impact on Neo-con politics, but a real analysis will show gaps. The underlying political driving force, applicable to the so called 'New World Order', is somewhat different.
The Frankfurt School is relevant:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School
This is important to know as it provides an important link back to Gramsci whose interpretation of Marx (distinct from Engels) is forming the basis of politic today both sides of the 'pond':
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci
Relevant to this blog, and not discussed so much considering it's content, is the simple observation that the 'family' has been and is under attack by the state.
Paedophilia is part of this, the enabling factors though, outside of black ops, do not appear to make much sense.
ie. Why does the state actively break families up these days, in particular segregating fathers from their children, and placing children into state care which exposes them to abuse ?
Monarch / MK-Ultra notions are relevant, but there is a more fundamental aspect which has deep roots in psychology and sociological theory.
For this: Frankfurt School, Theodor W. Adorno is relevant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno
Adorno produced a study called 'The Authoritarian Personality':
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Authoritarian_Personality
It argued that the willingness of the masses to follow the fascist dictators of Europe was rooted in the structure of the traditional family itself.
His solution: Break up the traditional family.
For all the incredible ideas concerning thought control and mind programming of children, this brutal act of the state is the easiest way to forever change them. According to Adorno, when those children reach adulthood they will be unlikely to follow a strong charismatic leader.
This is of course abhorrent and incorrect, but a reflection on where society is now reveals how it has been implemented. Consider carefully the full picture.
A final note on this is regarding liberalism.
The amoral version of liberalism which allowed the likes of Savile and others documented on this blog to become active is a perversion of what liberalism should be. It should not be confused with libertarianism which retains moral consequence as a core foundation.
One reason for conflict between the West and so called 'Islamism' is the simple fact that those opposed to the West do not wish to have their moral code denied by imposed western liberalism. In this sense, western liberalism can be regarded as being a highly passive aggressive ideology.
Think Alinsky Rule #4.
For 9/11: Operation Northwoods has recently come to light. Anyone who has been tracking the transponder irregularities will understand the relevance.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/northwoods.html
~~~
Chris Spivey...
12 comments:
he raped both his daughters
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2260233/German-actor-Klaus-Kinski-raped-daughter-repeatedly-age-FIVE.html
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/high-school-shooting-taft-california-183012601.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/so-many-people-died-the-american-system-of-suffering-1965-2014/5318285
http://uruknet.info/?p=m94186&hd=&size=1&l=e
http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/amid-federal-land-grab-in-brazil-whole-towns-evicted-at-gunpoint/30634/
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100188822/belatedly-fisking-radek-sikorski-long-but-comprehensive/
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/08/24/mental-health-group-looks-to-remove-stigma-from-pedophilia/#ixzz2HYqhj0EI
A Whole New World (Order): Disney’s RFID Tracking Bracelets
http://redicecreations.com/article.php?id=23282
The Saul Alinsky Rule #1 is a favourite at the moment:
RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
- Bullet purchases:
http://www.naturalnews.com/036847_ammo_purchases_government_stockpiling_media_lies.html
Fails credibility tests, but is enough to spook.
On many issues, Rule #4 is being used directly against all of us:
RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
- Think about that one carefully.
The other rules are worth working through ad thinking about: You will understand how certain broadcast interviews are put together.
Forewarned is forearmed: And most of these techniques can be reversed if necessary to get a desirable result.
With reference to Strauss / Kotb video, there is some more information in that area which is relevant and non-conspiracy.
Strauss had an impact on Neo-con politics, but a real analysis will show gaps. The underlying political driving force, applicable to the so called 'New World Order', is somewhat different.
The Frankfurt School is relevant:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School
This is important to know as it provides an important link back to Gramsci whose interpretation of Marx (distinct from Engels) is forming the basis of politic today both sides of the 'pond':
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci
Relevant to this blog, and not discussed so much considering it's content, is the simple observation that the 'family' has been and is under attack by the state.
Paedophilia is part of this, the enabling factors though, outside of black ops, do not appear to make much sense.
ie. Why does the state actively break families up these days, in particular segregating fathers from their children, and placing children into state care which exposes them to abuse ?
Monarch / MK-Ultra notions are relevant, but there is a more fundamental aspect which has deep roots in psychology and sociological theory.
For this: Frankfurt School, Theodor W. Adorno is relevant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno
Adorno produced a study called 'The Authoritarian Personality':
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Authoritarian_Personality
It argued that the willingness of the masses to follow the fascist dictators of Europe was rooted in the structure of the traditional family itself.
His solution: Break up the traditional family.
For all the incredible ideas concerning thought control and mind programming of children, this brutal act of the state is the easiest way to forever change them. According to Adorno, when those children reach adulthood they will be unlikely to follow a strong charismatic leader.
This is of course abhorrent and incorrect, but a reflection on where society is now reveals how it has been implemented. Consider carefully the full picture.
A final note on this is regarding liberalism.
The amoral version of liberalism which allowed the likes of Savile and others documented on this blog to become active is a perversion of what liberalism should be. It should not be confused with libertarianism which retains moral consequence as a core foundation.
One reason for conflict between the West and so called 'Islamism' is the simple fact that those opposed to the West do not wish to have their moral code denied by imposed western liberalism. In this sense, western liberalism can be regarded as being a highly passive aggressive ideology.
Think Alinsky Rule #4.
For 9/11: Operation Northwoods has recently come to light. Anyone who has been tracking the transponder irregularities will understand the relevance.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/northwoods.html
Alinsky is only repeating typical jewish thinking, they used these techniques continually in germany until the third reich came to power and threw them all out
so there is no picture of Allison Wyatt or Allison Whatt that can be relied on?
Why so many kids into care?
Breaking up the social structure is one part of it. Don't forget zionist strategy has always been small increments of change, always one step to far then a step back. Rothy and Rocky are homosexual and want a society where that, homosexual marriage and raising children is considered normal.
Destroying the fabric of society also goes back to Weishaupt and the Protocols road map derived from his ideal of a world order run by self-appointed elites.
More and more people understand, that Sandy Hook is a staged event, played by actors:
This is, what a 100% match looks like:
http://depositfiles.com/files/p70tyigwk
Password: celtic4568456
Thank you for the link.
cheers, brian
Post a Comment