Some of the beans spilled in this illumined production are evident without any identification of the characters in their multiple roles. More are spilled when you understanding who they represent.
Here's the description from IMDb. It was written by Mirror Images LTD, the entity representing the film's writer and director.
There's not much action but plenty of dialog. Most of the exchange is between Dr. Pyatt and Mr. Darnell in Pyatt's office. Those scenes are woven in with conversations Pyatt has with his friend Ovid, mostly over lunch. This isn't a review, so, as usual, there's spoilers.
I'm going to share a few insights that I think are most relevant because of the deception that is coming as the Antichrist is about to be revealed, and then is. Here's my plot summary.
Mr. Darnell comes to Dr. Pyatt as a patient, but not one who seeks the kind of help a typical patient might. The quite rational and intelligent Darnell claims to be from the future. He weaves an engaging tale of having discovered the secret to time travel, receiving it in a sudden insight. He shared it with the government and they paid him well for it. What he shared gave people the ability to view history, not the future. He withheld his knowledge of how to travel. The ability to view events all the way back to the beginning eventually went public and society basically crashed and burned because people lost hope for the future. The reality he described wasn't the truth, the revelation of the Bible, but rather the standard version (fabricated lies) that's taught in “public” school. Darnell gives the impression that by engaging Pyatt in this tale he's hoping to get some redemption, because he's a penitent man, by saving the world from the ruin he ignorantly brought upon it. He believes Pyatt is somehow going to be able to benefit from the wisdom he conveys and thereby change the course of history. By the end of the film, we come to understand that Pyatt and Darnell are the same man. Darnell went back in time in a gambit to "change fate" by warning his younger self of the outcome if he chooses to go down the same road. We see in the closing scenes the implication that, although the way it happens is different, the outcome will be the same. Pyatt-Darnell therefore fails in his attempt to change his destiny and the fate of the world.
There are many theories about time-space manipulation, viewing and travel. I'm not interested in theory, and not smart enough to figure things out on my own. I believe the Lord is able to inform us about what we need to know.
A notable scene takes place late in the film that is kind of a money shot, loaded up with symbolism. This image is the focal part of that. Pyatt is walking down the street carrying a bouquet of roses. The roses are lined up with a 5 point star. Stacked primary symbols of Venus don't just happen accidentally. That symbolism is not only well supported in the visual imagery, it factors in to the esoteric layer of the developing plot.
Pyatt buys the bouquet from a florist who wears a t-shirt bearing the classic winged emblem of angels and gods. It reads, The Falling.
The obvious reference is to the falling of angels, the subject of Genesis 6 and Enoch 8-9.
His apron makes allusion to the Masonic apron, and represents what that represents, a covering like Adam and Eve received prior to their eviction from the Garden of Eden.
A little research turns up the fact that the t-shirt names the title of Gyeney's first film, which he made while he was still a student in film school. The following excerpts from an interview are worth noting. (Nicholas Gyeney On 'The Penitent Man')
...
We shot the movie in 12 days in and around Seattle in the Capital Hill area in a big Masonic home/ retirement hospital. It’s a Masonic building called “The Landmark on the Sound”, which is a very cool place.”
A Masonic building. Sometimes that might not mean much, and sometimes it does. The film's symbolism suggests that all the locations were chosen with intent to leverage those symbols in the way of Occult ritual.
Here's the logo for Mirror Images, LTD. Again, that entity is basically, Nicholas Gyeney, the writer and director of the film. Drawing upon over 4 years of decoding as documented on this blog, it decodes to 666. Leveraging the letter i as a 9, the 999 formed inverts to 666. The reflection signals the Hermetic Maxim, As Above, So Below. It's a spiral “i” of Horus. Mirror Images, makes reference to the “twinning” of trauma-based
All that? Really? Yeah - and probably more. It's high level stuff.
Here's a sample of the conversation Darnell has with Pyatt in his office.
Darnell: No. That is not what I intended. You can't just give anyone the power to actually go back. Think of the ramifications of that. What I envisioned was more like a window in time.
Dr. Pyatt: A window? Like what? Like a big screen what you could just see history on?
Darnell: Yes, a bit simplified, but yes. Once it was released publicly, people could see any time they desired without directly affecting past events. It was the only way to keep it safe. So we thought.
Dr. Pyatt: So theoretically anybody could see anything.
Darnell: Think about it as memory recall. Everyone has experiences they can revisit even vividly. Now imagine events in time as memories for the world in the space-time continuum. I discovered a way to harness that.
Dr. Pyatt: Now you mentioned being able to see the creation of man. I mean, you could see humans assemble, develop their gods, and destroy each other. I mean, Jesus Christ!
Darnell: He was just a man. Imagine the devastation from a revelation like that. 95% of the world's population believed in a god in some form. The scientists, the politicians, and eventually the public were able to go back and see the Christian Son of God as a mortal man. It shook the foundations. Even atheists began to lose hope for the future. Southern evangelists began lashing out violently at anybody who supported the new discovery. The world was more divided than ever. The road to hell had been paved with good intentions, and it was just the beginning.
Dr. Pyatt: Well what happened, some kind of big war, or?
Darnell: Once the technology was simplified ... Only the most wealthy could afford it at first but with any new technology price decreases with time. People were going back to the beginning. They were peering into new dimensions of space and time looking for positive proof of evolution, the origins of man, the mythic stories from ancient Greece, and it spread like wildfire and informed civilization as we know it.
Dr. Pyatt: If this technology existed we could learn everything.
Darnell: Everything.
Dr. Pyatt: I mean, think of what we could do. What we could accomplish with that.
Hey, just think of what we could accomplish with that. Right. There's the familiar line of thinking that inspires many fools in their folly. Darnell acknowledges having thought that (when he was Pyatt, of course), but makes a point about the potential was exploited in actual practice to bring bad results instead of good.
I've been writing about the nature of the deception that will open the way for the Antichrist's reception. I put many examples on exhibit that illustrate how a window into the past will be opened as into the Akashic Record. A twisted version of history's most significant people and events will be actively projected, globally, and false memories will be activated in a shared experience that is both collective and individual in how it is interpreted. Religious figureheads must be targeted as the focus of attention, being the basis for social order with constraints imposed by the implicit morality structures of large segments of the population. Romans 11 reveals how the key to history and man lies with the identity named, and profaned, in the script of The Penitent Man.
Is the presentation of Jesus Christ as being just a mortal man going to be enough to shake the foundations of those who profess to be Christians? Sure, but you should know that the epic scam is going to go beyond that. Here's the biblical description that reveals how it's going to go.
What is revealed to us about that most threatening hour is not just about the saints being quickly shaken from our composure. There is a component that involves convincing evidence about the promised resurrection. Our hope rests firmly upon that, and, if that resurrection is already past, we will be left without hope.
It is my custom to repeat an important caveat, that it's not enough for you to believe what I'm telling you now about this event, to be spared from being deceived in that hour of crisis. Knowledge of the time and the trust relationship that represents is going to be essential.
I will repeat another precautionary warning, which you are probably choosing to ignore. If you are one who thinks you can continue taking matters of gender propriety lightly and still be found as one who “wins the race,” it's a bad bet. The problem Israel had in their wilderness trial was that they did not forsake their idols. That was an example for our benefit, ladies and gentlemen of the Body of Christ.
Moving on, Darnell describes a world where the gods are stripped of their deity, but that's not how it's going to be. A man will be deified and accepted as the incarnation of each man's god. The goddess will manifest in glory and affirm the deification as baptismal rites are performed by her high priest, the Pope. Key elements lacking in this film's script are furnished by the visual imagery and supported by the esoteric identities of the characters.
Let's explore one of Pyatt's clever lines a little more deeply.
“Now you mentioned being able to see the creation of man. I mean, you could see humans assemble, develop their gods, and destroy each other. I mean, Jesus Christ!”
When Pyatt says, “I mean, Jesus Christ!” we interpret it as an emotional outburst. We hear him uttering a common profanity, “taking the Lord's name in vain.” We dismiss the words, “I mean,” as filler words, a meaningless expression. Having just heard the same filler words in the previous expression, it's an obvious conclusion. Yet, when we make the effort to analyze it in context we discover a deeper meaning. Darnell seized the opportunity to declare from his enlightened perspective that “the Christian Son of God” was just a mortal man, making Him a liar and the Bible a falsified account, fraudulent. Pyatt's well crafted line is a similar assault, on the integrity of the apostles and eye witnesses to His resurrection. It's a subtle device. When he says, “I mean, Jesus Christ,” consider this as a tip-off. He's explaining the subject of his previous statement. About what he just said, he means, Jesus Christ. He is the subject, the singular “god” that he suggests men assembled and developed. “I mean, you could see humans assemble, develop their gods, and destroy each other. I mean, Jesus Christ!” He's referencing and supporting an age old conspiracy.
Matthew's gospel provides an account of what happened following the crucifixion.
I don't doubt that the conspiracy being given a further bump by Gyeney's clever script will be validated in the coming hour of crisis with false evidence, ported through time itself as a epic hoax. The evidence offered in support of the lie will be quite real. It just won't be true.
This script is playing out all over the internet. When they expose the lies of most churches, lots of people fall for it. Example catholic, episcopal, Methodist, (mainstream) etc. sorry to say it has effected my family. It was depressing me to the extreme. Had to give it to God, to save my sanity.
ReplyDeleteThat's the answer. He will take it, and leave us with peace. And even joy.
DeleteOr it was just a B Movie with many of the typical time travel tropes done clumsily. 23
ReplyDeleteYou must be new here. Welcome! I invite you to check out some of the videos we've produced on the open scroll youtube channel. The Back to the Future series, for example.
Delete