Paul Craig Roberts, Morgan Reynolds, William Rodriguez and 9 11

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/240605doubtsstory.htm

Greg Szymanski, at Prison Planet 24 June 24 2005, wrote that Paul Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, has expressed doubt about the official 9/11 story.

Morgan Reynolds, a former chief economist in the Bush I administration, recently criticized the government account of 9/11, calling the government story "bogus" and saying the WTC most likely fell from a controlled demolition.

Roberts said: "They (neo cons) are making such fatal mistakes and are about as insane as Hitler and the Nazi Party when they invaded Russia in the dead of the winter...

"The real story is not Morgan Reynolds or myself, but why have so many former Republican conservatives and top ranking officials who disagree with the neo cons been systematically run out of Washington? And, also, why is the media so intent on covering up the Bush-neo con agenda and all the mistakes surrounding it?

"I guess the real story about 9/11 is about what the people are actually saying. I’ve gotten hundreds of emails in response to my columns and many of them talk about not getting the truth from the government or the media about what really happened at the World Trade Center. I know many qualified engineers and scientists have said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at the manner in which it fell, you have to give their conclusions credibility."

~~~

http://www.lewisnews.com/article.asp?ID=105580

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

Greg Szymanski wrote:

"Morgan Reynolds called the official story about 9/11 bogus...

The former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush’s first term told the world he thought the WTC fell from a controlled demolition, indicating 9/11 was "an inside government job."

Reynolds concluded:

"It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and Building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either.

"The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings.

"More importantly, momentous political and social consequences would follow if impartial observers concluded that professionals imploded the WTC. Meanwhile, the job of scientists, engineers and impartial researchers everywhere is to get the scientific and engineering analysis of 9/11 right."


Szymanski commented: 'Not only did millions read his story on the Internet, but Reynolds controversial comments then drew instant attention from numerous mainstream newspapers, radio and television stations, including UPI, MSNBC, FOX News and over a dozen other major market local radio and TV stations.'

Reynolds said:

"I had a huge response and it really was amazing. I never expected so many people to respond so passionately. I literally received hundreds and hundred of emails, some agreeing with me and others, of course, disagreeing.

"After it was all said and done, as things are starting to finally quiet down now, I would guess it was about 5 to 1 in favor of what I was saying. However, I never imagined how much support there was out there for what I was suggesting occurred on 9/11...

"What it boils down to is that the government and the mainstream media are not digging into the 9/11 controversy because they are hiding something. From a media point of view, it’s the story of the century and they are not even trying to connect the dots.

"It’s nothing new. The government has always lied about so many things. Look at the Downing Street Memo, for example, the document confirming that the Bush administration lied to us about its motives for getting into the war.

" If they lied to us about this, what else? Well, 9/11 is just another example."

~~~

http://www.lewisnews.com/article.asp?ID=105580

Greg Szymanski wrote also about William Rodriguez.

William Rodriguez was the WTC janitor 'who heard and felt a strong explosion in the basement levels of the north tower just seconds before the jetliner crashed into the top floors.'

Rodriguez claims a massive underground explosion brought down the towers.

His story is strengthened further 'by 14 other eye witnesses who can verify his claims, as well as a burn victim from the basement explosion.'

Immediately after 9/11, Rodriguez tried to tell his story. Rodriguez claims the 9/11 Commission and the mainstream media have systematically censored his words in order to protect the official government story, a story ignoring the possibility of explosives being used to bring down the WTC.

Commenting on Rodriguez, Reynolds said:

"It’s not a coincidence that there was first an explosion below and then the jetliner explosion seconds later above. At least there should have been a thorough investigation since the timing of the explosions strikes me as an impossibility if you believe, as the government contends, that only a jetliner brought down the towers."