the Versailles Treaty

An ingenious product from the Tavistock Institute

Concrete peace efforts of the Central Powers Germany and Austria-Hungary have been around since 1916:

Already on December 21, 1915 , the Reichstag discussed at the request of the Social Democrats,

"Under what conditions the Chancellor is ready to enter into peace negotiations".

Chancellor von Bethmann Hollweg replied:

"Not to subjugate foreign peoples, we fight this imposed struggle, but to protect our lives and our freedom. Neither in the East nor in the West can our enemies of today have access gates. "

The Germans , in their overwhelming majority, believed they waged a war of defense .

On September 28, 1916, the British Secretary of War David Lloyd George announced the British war aims, according to the German Reich, the "knock-out" will be offset, Prussia supremacy broken, the Empire of Alsace-Lorraine separated from the Reich and between Germany and Russia Polish buffer state. The Danube Monarchy Austria-Hungary is to be dissolved and the German share of the multi-ethnic state to be affiliated to the German Reich .

On November 5, 1916 , the German Reich and Austria-Hungary proclaimed the Kingdom of Poland, but at first without exact demarcation.

On December 12, 1916 , the Central Powers (Germany and Austria-Hungary ) made a peace offer to the Entente Powers for the first time, which they rejected on December 30, 1916.

On March 23, 1917 , Emperor Charles I of Austria, under strict secrecy, wrestled with a relative of the Entente powers, revealing his readiness for peace (Sixtus Affair). The French, however, saw this offer as a sign of weakness and made Austria-Hungary unacceptable territorial claims. Germany was deeply annoyed, especially since they had gone to war as a result of loyalty to Austria-Hungary .

On December 22, 1917 , there was a ceasefire in the east, in Brest-Litovsk representatives of the new Soviet government negotiate with representatives of the Central Powers for a special peace.

On January 8, 1918 , in his annual message to Congress, the US President adopted a new peace initiative and presented his 14-point plan , including Germany's ceding Alsace-Lorraineto France and provinces to the east to Polish seed. The peoples of Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire should be allowed to determine their own fate.

On 3 March 1918 , the Central Powers in Brest-Litovsk concluded a separate peace with the Soviet Government.

On March 20, 1918 , the Austrian government tried in secret talks with the United States to obtain a special peace, but the Americans again put unacceptable conditions that amounted to a dissolution of Austria-Hungary.

On July 4, 1918, US President Wilson called the American war aims:

1. The destruction of autocratic rule, not based on the will of a people.
2. The agreement of all states to resolve their conflicts in the future at the negotiating table in compliance with international law.
3. The recognition of international law by all peoples of the earth.
4. The establishment of an international peace organization.

On September 27, 1918 , the Austro-Hungarian Government proposed that all warring powers enter into negotiations for a peace agreement. The Allies rejected this proposal sharply. Wilson indicated in a speech that they were not negotiating with representatives of imperial Germany and Austria-Hungary and called for the overthrow of the monarchies in both countries.

On October 3, 1918 , Chancellor Max von Baden asked the United States for a truce. These declare themselves ready only if Germany recognizes from the outset all the demands of the United States and its allies, and if a people-formed government would replace the monarchy.

The last point, interference in internal affairs, was unacceptable even to the German Social Democrats. Max von Baden tried repeatedly to persuade the US to negotiate peace, but these remained tough:

"If the monarchy is not abolished (...), Germany can not negotiate peace, but must surrender," said Wilson on October 23, 1918.

In a few days between October and November 1918, the collapse of the Danube monarchy took place. Numerous countries of Austria-Hungary declare their independence and formed their own national governments.

In Germany, many Social Democratic newspapers spoke out in favor of overthrowing the Emperor. The Emperor left Berlin on 29 October 1918 and traveled to the German headquarters in Spa. The Prussian Minister of War Heinrich Scheuch summed up the result:

"The abdication is compulsion and remains compulsion."

Some also considered the idea that the emperor should "find a soldier's death at the front."

In early November, the sailors of the High Seas Fleet began to mutiny. In Berlin, plans were announced that the Soviet Russian Embassy, ​​in cooperation with German revolutionary groups, was preparing to overthrow it. The German government immediately expelled the Soviet ambassador Adolf Joffe from Germany.

On 9 November 1918. In Germany, revolution broke out, like a house of cards collapsed centuries-old monarchy together and everywhere were soldiers and workers councils. Chancellor Max von Baden tried Kaiser Wilhelm II. To move because he feared that the revolution would radicalise more and more to abdicate.

At Spa, the front generals did not want to fight for the Kaiser anymore and telegraph to Berlin that

"Can be expected to renounce the emperor."

Chancellor Prince Max of Baden then officially announced the resignation of the emperor, which had not explained this. Wilhelm II wanted expressly, as he said in a telegram, not to renounce his royal throne in Prussia , but interested in Berlin no one else.

Max von Baden resigned on the same day, the Social Democrat Philipp Scheidemann proclaimed from a window of the Reichstag s, the first German republic.

A few hours later , Karl Liebknecht (Independent Socialist) proclaimed the "Socialist Republic" from the balcony of the Berlin Palace.

Friedrich Ebert (SPD) declared himself the new Chancellor and announced to the population:

"Today has completed the liberation of the people."

Wilhelm II officially renounced the throne on November 28, 1918.

From a constitutional point of view, the symbolic "proclamation" or "proclamation" had no meaning, as Emperor Wilhelm II abdicated only on 28 November and thus the monarchy continued to exist in Germany until that date.

Now the will of the Allies was fulfilled, the monarchy abolished and the cease-fire negotiations could begin.

The abolition of the monarchy in Germany was by no means meant by the Entente Powers as a treat for the German people. The British Empire, Italy , Belgium, Japan, Romania, Portugal, to name just a few, possessed monarchies even after 1918.

The German domestic and foreign policy was not designed by Kaiser Wilhelm II , even if he always like to intervene deeply in this. From 1871 to 1918 Germany was a parliamentary monarchy with the same direct suffrage and a secret ballot.

The victorious powers of 1918 knew very well the integrating effect of a monarchy on large states, which is why the newly created South Slavic multinational state was proclaimed as the "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes" (later Kingdom of Yugoslavia) on 1.12.1918.

Rather, it was hoped that the unloved German Reich would fall apart so that it would have to do with itself, as it had done before 1871. Divide and rule is a very old principle of domination.

In the Danube monarchy Austria Hungary , the plans of the Allies arose, the multi-ethnic state disintegrated. The chaos of this decay, combined with new borders that divided the peoples more than one, is felt to this day. Although Germany fell into chaos and anarchy as a result of unrest, overthrows and civil-warlike conditions (there had never been a real and planned revolution in 1918) , Bavaria, Rhinelanders, Saxons, Silesians, etc. had already been merged into Germans and separatists through the common experience of the German Empire all shades had no chance. Great service to the unity of the empire acquired thereby the social-democraticChancellor Friedrich Ebert, who together with the iron fist of Gustav Noske (Social Democrat, Reichswehr Minister 1919/20) held the country together in those difficult days.

On November 11, 1918 , French Marshal Ferdinand Foch dictated to the German armistice delegation the conditions for ending the fighting that amounted to a capitulation. The blockade of the German ports also remained and thus the food blockade of the victorious powers continued even after the end of the fighting.

Even fishing in the Baltic Sea was prevented by the British Fleet Commander. The effects of the blockade were devastating. In the nine months following the ceasefire, it has caused the deaths of over 800,000 people in the German Reich .

"... the blockade [will] be enforced with vigor. This weapon of starvation is aimed primarily at women and children, the elderly, the sick and the poor ... " declared Winston Churchill on March 14, 1919, in the English House of Commons.

In the Versailles treaties, an additional document was created by the US government in 1919 , which was added to these treaties.

In this document, known as the "Morgenthaus Pastoral Policy", which was signed by US President Woodrow Wilson and presented at the Versailles Treaty, it is said that the US intends, as a measure after the German surrender, to Eradication of all Germans.

The German race represents a "warlike breed from birth" and one intends the transformation of Germany into "pastureland".

The document was among the other papers of former President Lyndon Baines Johnson, now kept at the Sid W. Richardson Research Center, UT Austin. (Space Aliens from the Pentagon, William R. Lyne, 1993, Creatopia Productions, Lamy, NM 87540 USA, p. 41).

"The treaty should satisfy brigands, imperialists and militarists. He is a death blow to all those who had hoped the end of the war would bring peace. It is not a peace treaty, but an explanation for another war. " (British MP Philip Snowden on the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, Des Griffin," Who rules the world, "1986, p. 131).

On January 6, 1919, the London journal "The Jewish World" wrote:

"International Judaism has forced Europe to plunge into this war, not only to gain possession of much of the world's gold, but also to use the same gold to launch a new Jewish World War II. ). " (cited n." Harold Cecil Robinson, "Damned Anti-Semitism", March 1995, Verlag Neue visions, CH-8116 Würenlos, p. 119).

"It will be the German man whose destruction Judaism has set itself apart and must have for the establishment of its world domination, and the German man will be the one who, seeing and now truly recognizing the enemy, still ends this world domination with an unexpected end will prepare. " (The Jewish writer Arthur Trebitsch in" German Spirit or Judaism ", Vienna 1921, p. 45)

As early as February 11, 1922, Isaac Sallbey wrote in "Der Türmer":

"The German race must be destroyed, there is no doubt about that" (quoted in "Harold Cecil Robinson," Damned Anti-Semitism ", supra, p. 119 and" The Inheritance of Moses "by Joachim Kohln, p. 3)

Walter Rathenau called on France in 1922 to

"Completely murdering all Germans and allowing Germany to settle with foreign peoples" (Source: "Birth Pains of a New World", by Carlos Baagoe, Samizdat Publishing, Toronto, p. 143).

On 20.7.1932 the "Jewish World League" (Bernat Lecache) wrote:

"Germany is our public enemy # 1. It is up to us to mercilessly declare war on it." (Quoted in "Harold Cecil Robinson," Damned Anti-Semitism, "supra, p. 119).

On January 30, 1933, Reich President Paul von Hindenburg appointed Adolph Hitler, as the chairman of what was then the strongest German party, Reich Chancellor after much hesitation. A few weeks later, on March 24, 1933, the answer was:

London's "Daily Express", the millionth edition at that time the largest daily newspaper in the United Kingdom, overwrote its edition of March 24, 1933 seven columns:

"Judaism declares war on Germany!"

Below was:

"14 million Jews ... declare war".

The next official Jewish declaration of war was pronounced in August 1933 by the President of the International Jewish Federation to Combat Hitlerite Oppression of Jewish, Samuel Untermayer. It says:

"This now decided war against Germany is a holy war. He must be led against Germany until his end, until his annihilation. " This statement was published by the New York Times on August 7, 1933. (cited n. "Harold Cecil Robinson," Damned Anti-Semitism ", supra)

In January 1934, Rabbi Vladimir Yabotinsky, founder of the Zionist organization Masha Ritchh, issued the following statement:

"For months, the fight against Germany has been waged by every Jewish community, every conference, every congress, in every trade union, and by every single Jew in the world.

We will kindle a spiritual and a material war of the whole world ...

Our Jewish interests demand the complete annihilation of Germany. " (Quoted n." Birth pangs of a new world ", p. 140)

On July 27, 1935, Vladimir Jabotinski said in "The Jewish Daily Bulletin":

"There is only one power that really counts, that is the power of political pressure. We Jews are the most powerful nation in the world because we have the power to know and use. "

(cited n. "Harold Cecil Robinson," Damned Anti-Semitism, "supra, p. 119).

"The war is a decided thing," said US Ambassador Bullit on April 24, 1939 in Paris, as the citizens of Germany, as almost everywhere, firmly believed in peace . (cited in "Harold Cecil Robinson," Damned Anti-Semitism, "supra, p.

A few days after the British declaration of war on Germany, on September 5, 1939 , the then Zionist leader Dr. Chaim Weizmann of the British Government (Chamberlain) 20,000 men for use in the Middle East and a total of an army of 100,000 Jews, as a fighter against Germany.

"I strongly encourage the statement that we Jews will fight alongside Britain and for democracy. The Jewish Mission is ready to immediately conclude an agreement to use all human Jewish power, its resources, and its capabilities against Germany, " wrote the World Chronicle and the Jewish World Chronicle on September 5, 1939, as well as the "Times". (Source: "Damned Anti-Semitism", Harold Cecil Robinson, supra, p. 118).

Eli Ravage:

"The German people are the first to be condemned to death." (Cit. N. "Birth pangs of a new world", p. 141)

Nathan merchant:

" 48 million Germans are to be sterilized, so that within two generations that becomes the finished fact, what would otherwise cost millions of lives and centuries of effort: namely the extinction of Germanism and its bearers." (Source: "birth pangs of a new world" p. 142)

The Centralblad voor Israeliten in Nederland wrote on September 13, 1939:

"Millions of Jews in America, England, France, Africa and Palestine are determined to carry the extermination war against Germany until its total annihilation ". (cited n. "Harold Cecil Robinson," Damned Anti-Semitism, "supra, p. 119).

The official organ of the Zionist Association of Belgium, "L'avenier Juif", no. 191, of 16 February 1940 proclaimed the "Jewish century" and raised the following claim to world domination:

"At the end of the present war, one can say that all the roads lead to Jerusalem. There will not be a single problem in Central and Eastern Europe that can be solved without Jerusalem and without which Palestine would have approved it. "(Quoted in" Eidgenoss ", Verlag-Eidgenoss, CH-8401 Winterthur, p. 12)

The Canadian newspaper "Evening Telegram", Toronto wrote on 26.2.1940:

"The Jewish World Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years." (Quoted in "Harold Cecil Robinson," Damned Anti-Semitism, "supra, p. 120).

02/26/1940. The "Jewish World Congress" (Maurice Perlzweig), British Section confirmed:

"The Jewish World Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years without interruption." (Quoted in "Harold Cecil Robinson," "Damned Anti-Semitism," see above, p.120).

Rabbi Stephan S. Wise said on May 8, 1940:

"This war is our business" (Source: "The Legacy of Moses" by Joachim Kohln, p. 4 and "Harold Cecil Robinson," Damned Anti-Semitism ", see above, p. 119).

On October 8, 1942, the Jewish magazine "The Sentinel" wrote in Chicago:

"The Second World War is being conducted to defend the essential principles of Judaism." (Quoted n. "Harold Cecil Robinson," Damned Anti-Semitism, "supra, p. 119).

It is also known that around 1939, newly fed hysteria in the world press of Germany's alleged efforts to conquer far-off countries had driven the escalation to European and finally world war development.

Already in the "New York Times" there were related treatises already on the 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th, 21st December 1938 and 1.1.1939. The responsible for this purpose responsible persons of the press , which at that time was already internationally largely synchronized, can not be issued a certificate for peace will. They belong to the desk desk, the emotional pacemakers of uncompromising and crusading.

WELL, WHAT DOES ALL THIS MEAN?

Harold Cecil Robinson writes on page 122:

"The Jewish plan for THE JEWISH WORLD to unleash World War II was taken" when Hitler had not decided to become a politician. "

That the "German race must be destroyed," said the Türmer, before Hitler even began to think about the topic of race. Hitler became Reich Chancellor eleven years later, on January 30, 1933. "(cited n." Harold Cecil Robinson, "Damned Anti-Semitism," supra, p. 119).

"The youth must know that the Second World War of Roosevelt and his friends, whose name one knows, was already decided in January 1933. The war could not be prevented by Germany. Unless it had renounced its freedom. " (Carl Vincent Krogmann, Governing Mayor of Hamburg until 8.5.1945 in" It was about Germany's future ", p.364)

Szembek, the Secretary of State in the Polish Office, said to the Commissioner Roosevelt Bullit on 12.8.1935:

"We are witnessing an attacking policy of the world against Hitler, even more than an aggressive policy of Hitler against the world." (Quoted n. "Eidgenoss", see above)

Churchill to ex-Chancellor Brüning 1938:

"What we want is the complete annihilation of the German economy." (Quoted n. "Eidgenoss", see above)

"Not war fixes the plight under which all peoples suffer, but the insight that the coexistence of nations must occur in the place of the opposite." (Rudolf Hess on 14.5.1935 in front of the royal family in Stockholm quoted n. "Swiss Confederation ", see above)

"I do not want a war! We now need 15-20 years of peaceful construction to secure what we have created ...

Therefore, I will agree to any compromise that is compatible with the honor and reputation of the German people in order to avoid a war. " Adolf Hitler before the Reichstag on August 27, 1939 (cited above," Oath, "see above)

The Jewish writer Emil Ludwig Cohn formulated it in 1934:

"Hitler does not want the war, but he will be forced to do so." (Quoted in "Eidgenoss" print on the Jewish declaration of war, publisher Eidgenoss, CH-8401 Winterthur)

Lord Vansittart, senior official of the Foreign Office, said in 1933:

"... If Hitler succeeds, he will get a European war within five years." (Quoted in "Eidgenoss," see above)

"There will be no Germany after the next war." "Youngstown Jewish News", Ohio, USA, April 16, 1936 (cited above, "Swiss Confederation," see above)

"Hitler does not want the war, but he will be forced to, not in this year, but soon ... The last word, as in 1914, England to speak." Emil Ludwig in "Les Annales", June 1934 (quoted n. Dr. H. Jonak von Freyenwald in "Jewish Confessions", facsimile publishing house, Bremen 1992).

Dresden was chosen for destruction by a TERRORACT, which was not intended against the Nazis, but against the German people in itself.

The bombing of Dresden, which caused a raging inferno of destruction that destroyed more than 100,000 people, was devised and led by a group of social psychiatrists on the strategic bombing survey, which is linked to the Special Operations Command of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS).

This group was effectively headed by the director of the British Psychological Warfare Directorate, Brig. Gen. John Rawlings Rees, director of the Tavistock Clinic in London, which had served as the center of British Empire psychological warfare operations since the 1920s.

The crew of the strategic bombing survey, which included a host of Tavistock-based staff from the United States, including Kurt Lewin, Rensis Likert, and Margaret Mead, theorized that the terror inflicted on the German population by the "News of Dresden" turned its back on Breaking the fight and leaving her anxious, startled, and confused.

They projected that he would have a lasting effect on Germany, removing that nation from the great states of Europe and turning it into a permanently psychologically injured entity.

The German people, they argued, would be led to the realization that "all German," all of its culture and history, could be wiped off in a moment like this by those powers that would oppose an aggressive future Germany.

In his book of 1941, "Time Perspective and Morale," Kurt Lewin described the psychology behind the application of this terror tactic for mass effects:

"One of the main techniques of breaking morality through a 'strategy of terror' is this very tactic - keep the person confused as to where he stands and what he can expect.

In addition, if frequent vacillation between strict disciplinary action and promises of good treatment, along with disseminating conflicting messages, make the deliberate structure of this situation extremely unclear, then the individual could give up knowing whether a particular plan would lead him to or from his destination ,

Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks will be paralyzed by severe internal conflicts over what to do. "

When the pilots and their crews became aware of what they had done - the creation of a raging inferno, burning civilian targets and civilians - many returned in horror to their bases. At the behest of the PsyOp warriors, the crews had not been fully briefed on the mission.

Now they were received by the teams of psychologists and others who would profile their reactions to the terror they had set free; They were told, like the crews who later unnecessarily dropped atomic bombs on two Japanese cities, that it would "shorten the war."

As a former intelligence officer declared decades later,

"We killed out of pure terror, slaughtering people as TERRORISTS WOULD DO. And it had no effect on the shortening of the war. In fact, it seemed more likely to help drive the German people into Hitler's government. The fools who developed this mission probably prolonged the war. "(Emphasis added)

The attack on the US on September 11, most notably the WTC attack, is designed for a similar PSYCHOKRIEG brainwashing effect.

The September 24 issue of "The New Yorker" commented that, according to "defense experts," the blow of 9/11

"Is clearly an example of what military strategists call 'PsyOps'; that is, a hallmark of warfare whose goal is not to eliminate military objectives, but to undermine the overall will of a nation and its people. "

The article goes on to quote from a 1999 document by military strategist and analyst Joseph Cyrulik of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) at Georgetown University in Washington DC,

" Asymmetric Warfare and the Threat of the American Homeland ":

"By murdering and injuring people, damaging and destroying their homes and communities, destroying their jobs and livelihoods, an enemy can inflict pain to the point where the people demand a change in their government's policies.

Used in the right place at the right time ... an attack could ruin the trust of the people in their government, their military and themselves.

It could become a decisive attack on the political will of a whole population. "

Cyrulik is part of a "thinker network" that seeks to change all military doctrines to accommodate the supposed threats of the 21st century; For this purpose, this network wants to stimulate PsyOps ( Psychological Operations ) including "covert warfare" such as assassinations .

While we can not say that such people are directly responsible for what happened on September 11, their views on strategy, tactics, and the high status of psychological warfare, as well as the misleading involved, as they "terrorist organizations" or " Rogue States " attributed power, fits nicely into the whole operation.

There are new methods that were not available at the time of the Dresden attack to maximize the psychological effects of a TERROR CAMPAIGN , which correspond to standard brainwashing techniques . One involves the repetition of frightening images, the kind that would discourage a person, but then force them to look further.

Such frightening images weaken the mind's ability to reason and make it more sensitive to suggestion and manipulation.

In the hours following the attack on the World Trade Center, every television broadcast on the United States Radio spilled over and over again the images of the planes crashing into the twin towers, from every imaginable angle, and then the shots of the collapse of the two towers. It was probably the most frightening real shot that most Americans ever saw.A population that was put into a state of terror and shock was then bombarded with SUGGESTIONS: images appeared, fleeting photos of the alleged criminals and the image of the "evil leader" behind the act, Osama bin Laden.

God, this is like a movie, "said CBS host Dan Rather when the first tower of the World Trade Center collapsed. "Just it's real." ,

Did you also feel as if you witnessed the cruelty of the WTC attack that you had seen before? You probably have too - and that's part of the brainwashing process.

There have been at least half a dozen films over the past five years whose plots have focused on a terrorist attack on the United States.

Statisticians from Hollywood have estimated that they have been viewed in cinemas and in home videos by more than 100 million people. And, many of these recent films have described " Arabs " or "Islamic fundamentalists" behind the terrorist attacks.

Each of the latter films has some "expert" adviser, usually a "former counter terrorism expert" and in some cases someone who has worked in the military. Although it is exaggerated to argue that the film production companies or the "experts" are necessarily deliberate accomplices in the current plot, the films have helped with their "controlled" scripts to make people believe that "Arab" terrorists are capable of doing so could be what was done on September 11th.

Long before television existed, images were used for "playback" in America's storage banks - first through the print media and then early in the 20th century with the first of the real mass media, the movies.Hollywood is part of the Anglo-American media cartel, made even more apparent by the creation of an "entertainment conglomerate" through mergers and acquisitions. So, a mere handful of companies with interdisciplinary boards of directors, made up of people from the Anglo-American establishment, control everything we see on television, read in newspapers, or see on the Internet.

While films have become a real mass media phenomenon, Anglo-American commentator Walter Lippmann described their power, along with the power of the media in general, to shape "public opinion" - what you and your neighbors think.

In his 1921 "Handbook" on Mass Manipulation of the Common Mind, "Public Opinion," Lippmann, who had been trained among others by Rees at the British Propaganda Directorate during World War I, writes in his introductory chapter, "The World Out There and the Images in our heads ":

"Public opinion cares about the indirect, unnoticed and confusing facts, and there is nothing obvious about them ...,

The images in the minds of these people, of themselves, of others, of their needs, intentions and circumstances, are their opinions. Those images, used by groups of people or individuals acting on behalf of groups, are public opinion in capital letters ...

the image inside [in the head] so often misleads men in their dealings with the outside world. "

Somewhere in your memory banks, the "images in your head" of the WTC attack were set up. New York film critic Anthony Lane writes in the September 24 issue:

"How many times have we heard these words [since September 11].

The Factual Statement: 'Worst terrorist attack since Oklahoma City'.

The promise: 'You understand us correctly - we hunt the enemy, find the enemy, and we kill the enemy.'

The warning: 'You can not fight a war against an enemy you can not see.',

And the ominous foresight: 'This is a time of war; the fact that he is within our borders means that it is a new kind of war. '

We have learned such feelings as a screenplay; because we have heard it again and again [in the days since September 11] it has not diminished the conviction with which we have given our consent. The only catch: It IS a script. All lines are quoted from the 1998 thriller by Edward Zwick, The Siege '. "

The plot of this film concerns a network of "Arab" terrorist cells that are committing acts of increasing intensity against civilian targets in New York City. President Clinton's video clips commenting on attacks by his government against Osama bin Laden's networks were cut into the footage.

As the terrorists wreak havoc and kill more people, New York City is placed under martial law; Anyone who looks like an "Arab" is rounded up and sent to internment camps even as the violence continues.

In the end, the film becomes a sermon on how to handle attacks on the Constitution and on ethnic profiling of Americans as the nation continues to fight the foreign "Arab" terrorist enemies.

When "The Siege" was published in November 1999, he was received with protests by the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee, who accused him of "portraying Arabs and Muslims as a homogeneous, threatening crowd" and described the film produced by Rupert Murdoch's 20th Century Fox as "dangerous and incendiary".

Despite such protests and the relatively poor reports, the film sold a few million dollars in tickets and went well with its video release. When he mentioned how successful the movie brainwashing effort has been, Lane noted in the New Yorker that the majority of Americans responded to these cases with the same kind of unfounded feelings they express in the cinema or at home:

"And the exclamations from the ground, from the observers of the sky, who were shot on video when they saw the plane rushing into the tower side: where have you recently heard those expressions - the Wows, the Whoohs, the Holy Shit - if not in cinemas, and maybe out of their own chatterbox ". Hollywood, writes Lane, has delivered "sensory education ..." through films such as "The Siege" and "The Hard", "eagerly devoured by a hungry public."

On the days following the attack, the approval score for President Bush shot up to over 90% and stayed there, especially after his September 13 national televised televised speech. After the speech, a CNN commentator stated that approval for the president was so high because he acted as the Americans expected him to:

"Like the President from 'Independence Day' or a guy from 'West Wing' [a popular TV series]."

MORPHING OF THE ENEMY PICTURE

Look more closely at the image of Osama bin Laden, as it appears on TV screens, during this time of a new "war." In PsyOps terms, bin Laden has become the enemy image - the image that holds a targeted population in consciousness as the person or, more specifically, the type of person who fights it. There is the dark complexion, the beard, the kaftan, the weapons in hand - all present, all as expected, an ideal subject for the projected rage and hatred of an injured nation.

It does not matter that bin Laden is not really the "bad leader".

In the days and weeks leading up to the terrorist attack, media control groups have reported that the major US news broadcasts, including the CNN and Fox News cable networks , have devoted an excessive amount of their airtime to "bin Laden" international reporting, calling them " terrorist leaders " or " Terrorist " described, almost always accompanied by photos or video clips.

But its creation by the media as a "terrorist leader" does not start here.

To understand what has happened, you have to look at a nearly 30-year span of news coverage that takes us to the point where a certain person, a former and current agent of the US-British-Israeli intelligence network, emerges from "caves". and other bases operating in one of the world's most isolated and isolated areas, has become the "public enemy No. 1" of the United States.Consider the bin Laden bin Laden as a morphing process that begins with the television image of the Black September terrorists at the 1972 Olympics. Then follow the pictures from the year 1973 of the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat; later there are the pictures of the Iranian Ayatollah Khomeini and the fanatical mullahs.

Imagine someone in Hollywood's casting center trying to find a person who represents the terrorist archetype, given these past images and descriptions: an oil-rich, almost mystical church type (though he does not occupy a religious position), which looks like a mixture of the "enemies" Arafat and Khomeini, gets "the role".

The population has also been prepared to accept the "story" that terrorists who commit such things as the events of September 11,

ARABIC AND / OR MUSLIM FANATICS MUST ,

as thousands of hours of television broadcast have repeated. Arab organizations in this country report on the poll results showing that Americans by a wide margin, even without supporting evidence, believe that every act of terrorism is of "Arab" origin and has "Arab" criminals.

As one intelligence source said this week, within the first few minutes of the attack on the World Trade Center, the Americans decided that this was being done by "Arab terrorists" linked to the "terrorist leader" bin Laden. "You did not have to tell them that," the source said. "They were already conditioned to believe it.

"Are not such people" brainwashed "?

We are told that our press is "free".

But is not that a lie?

How "free" can it be when it lies about the most important event of our time, is misrepresented on almost every occasion; if the truth can not be found anywhere in the buffet of news broadcasts containing our famous "free press".

In Nazi Germany, Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels indicated that the press was free to report whatever she wanted. But, this press was "coordinated" by the operation of a "press trust" that embraced all media. That Nazis engineered stories in the press that used their purposes, and the Trust duly reported them, with numerous modifications that might give the impression that not all the media received information from the same pump.

Even though Americans hardly believe it,

IN PRACTICE, THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NAZI PRESS RELEASE PROPAGAND AND THE ANGLOAMERIC MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT CARTEL

It's not hard to turn the coverage of an event into something that fits almost any purpose-as long as the purpose meets the needs of those elites that control the media. All that is needed is to set up some key key events, which are then flushed through the media channels.

Before you know it, the poor citizen is flooded. In one sense, the Nazi operation was less insidious because it was more obvious; only fools would not notice that they were serving the "line" of Goebbels and his crew. Here, however, the semblance of choice confuses, the appearance of the flood of information confuses the average citizen, so he is convinced that he

THE TRUTH GETS, EVEN WHERE .

But even a cursory content analysis of all or most of our news sources, especially the main TV channels, shows that the overall content line of all sources is basically the same.

Similarly, the decision to hide the existing global depression and financial collapse. Although there may be no formal meetings among the leaders of the media cartel in which such policies are refined, nonetheless a political consensus mercilessly forces the content of the "news".

However, in times of crisis, such as the present ones, some of the controls become more visible; less is left to chance.

It has been reported by some sources that within a few hours of the September 11 attacks, "executive orders" were issued which placed the US media under effective censorship. This does not mean that the government auditors of the news reports actually gave orders to censor reports; it is said that they havetened to block any reports that would mean leaving the "Official Line".

(There was also co-ordination on the scope of coverage.) It was reported that all broadcasting media were advised to discontinue the normal program in favor of the 24-hour coverage of the "US Terrorist Attack" and "America at War", as well as the " Identification Logos "appeared on all channels, and it is also reported that the White House and National Security officials participated in the decision to annul all major sporting events.)

What causes this has been explained to us, namely, government sources have been muzzled, and all the information that comes out about the attacks and the investigation is under "top-down control." This was understood by those who control the news coverage of the mainstream media following voluntary censorship.

THE BEATING OF THE WAR DRUMS

There was, for a short time, this morning of September 11, when the big brainwashing machine allowed the visual impact of the terror message to infiltrate before the signal for the heads of speech was given to utter the name of the enemy.

If it seemed to some that no matter which channel you switched on during those earliest hours - radio or cable - you saw the same dozen or so of moguls, it was not wrong: this is confirmed by various media guardian reports Service. For example, a media guardian organization has reported more than a dozen appearances by former CIA director James Woolsey in the first few days after the attack, which at any time sends the message about the need to wage war against Iran, Iraq, and anyone else who allegedly bin Laden and his peers promoted, repeated.

A barely less shrill Senator John Warner (Virginia) appeared numerous times; With Henry Kissinger, we could not keep up with the counting.

As the media watchdog group Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR) stated, any hope could be buried after September 11 that the media would give an impartial account of what happened that they could resist the campaign for an unclear war , Instead, FAIR documented how print and broadcast media produced emotional tirades for war, echoing what they believed was the attitude of the American people; as a result, Americans still have no clear idea of ​​what happened, or what the Bush administration is specifically proposing to do to protect it from future terrorist threats.

Consider these selected examples, which could be reinforced by many more:

• Kissinger clone Larry Eagleburger performing on CNN on the day of the attack: "There is only one way to deal with such people, you have to kill some of them, even if they were not directly involved in this."
• The "New York Post" the next day: " The answer to this unimaginable 21st-century Pearl Harbor should be as quick as it is fast - kill the bastards. A shot between the eyes, blows them up, poison them if necessary. And the cities or countries of these armies of worms bombards them flat like basketball courts. "
• On Sept. 14th an "Opinion Editorial" in the Washington Times by Defense Intelligence Agency official: "As a bare minimum, tactical nuclear weapons should be used against bin Laden's camps in the desert of Afghanistan. Less would be considered by the poisoned ghosts who orchestrated these attacks to be rightly considered cowardice on the part of the United States and the present government. "
• FAIR commentator and media warden Norman Solomon commented that many of the same people who now demanded a "war on terrorism" and anyone who could endorse it (including many analysts who appeared as speech makers and Opinion Editorial columnists) themselves became involved were to support terrorists, including Osama bin Laden, as such efforts were official, "If, then secret" US politics were.

"How can a long-term terrorist partner now credibly denounce 'terrorism'?" He asks. "Very easily. All that is required for media coverage is to obtain a kind of history-free zone that has no use in facets of reality that are not currently convenient to admit. "

One of those " uncomfortable facts " was the well documented involvement of the people of the "US Special Ops" and the bunch around Zbigniew Brzezinski; then, later, Ollie North and the Bush people with bin Laden, dating back to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, which became the largest "state sponsorship" of terrorism, or at least a then-dominant faction of our government and intelligence community.

FAIR and other media outreach groups report that almost no one mentioned these "uncomfortable" affairs under the vast flow of war propaganda; and if, then only to lie, that this policy had not been in operation for a long time.

Similarly, much attention has been paid to the reports on the work of the FBI and other agencies as they put together the "conspiracy" behind the attack. To date, no one in the major US media broadcasts has ever mentioned that there is a possibility of involvement with US elements. Instead, reporting has focused on a combination of "diggers" for clues and trails, as well as alleged links to the bin Laden network.

FAIR commented on such coverage that bin Laden's snapshots and his camps gave the impression that more than circumstantial evidence links him to the attacks. The only evidence offered had come from "secret service leaks" from the war propaganda apparatus formed by the executive order or by the claims of speech heads and other "experts."

The only feature that is common to all reporting is the detection of every possible trace leading to a domestic source of terrorism control. So is the whole reporting so "coordinated and controlled"? It's clear that some spinners, such as Bill O'Reilly of Fox News, a particularly worthless character, are simply given free rein for their insanity.

On September 17 O'Reilly demanded that if the Taliban did not hand over Bin Laden,

"Should the United States Ruin the Afghan Infrastructure - Airport, Power Plants, Water Works and the Streets ..."

This is a very primitive country. And to take their viability should not be difficult. Remember, the people of every country are responsible for the government they have. The Germans were responsible for Hitler. The Afghans are responsible for the Taliban. We should not target civilians. But if they do not oppose their government, they starve to death, point by point. "

He continued to advocate in this and other broadcasts that

"Once again, to make Iraqi people feel intense pain"

and to block Libya from all food supplies:

"Let her eat sand."

As is typical in a propaganda campaign of the "gray PsyOps", the extremely crazy talk against those are played only slightly less crazy, to make the latter look reasonable compared. Thus, O'Reilly makes a Woolsey look like a sober analyst while demanding a war to eliminate governments that support terrorism and a "cautious" and "calculated" escalating response against bin Laden.

In order to keep people's attention in order to keep them "in line," it was necessary to keep them in a highly emotional state. There was a steady stream of "human affairs" stories about the suffering of the victims, about the courage of the rescue workers and those who perished, along with snapshots of concerned citizens. While the courage and suffering are real, the constant bombardment with these images is the

BRAIN WASH CONDITIONING .

Without them, after a few days you would have turned off CNN and the "news" reporting.

, CRASH? WHAT KIND OF CRASH?

Under the hysteria of war, or rather "swirled" in it, reporting lost what would otherwise be the biggest story of the day: the complete collapse and pressure loss of the financial markets. The markets had lost almost 20% to the end since Wall Street reopened on September 17. A fall at this speed is usually called "crash", spreading widespread panic not only among traders and brokers, but also among the general population.

But in the two weeks of this crash, not one commentator in one of the big media has used that word! We were also told that it is our patriotic duty to have faith in the eventual renewal of markets and the economy.

"We can not allow the terrorists to defeat us and bring down our economy,"

Financial commentator Louis Ruckeyser said in his televised "Wall Street Week."

As Lyndon LaRouche has said, in the bankrupt state of the world financial system, the crash would have happened anyway without the events of September 11th. Now, however, most, if not all, financial analysts appearing on television news and print media generally accuse Osama bin Laden of everything that has happened. This is to be expected, they claim, after the events of September 11, which is the biggest of all "big lies".

A dealer said:

"My God! The ground is broken and nobody calls it a crash. It's like your patriotic job not to mention the word.

Hell, the Dow lost more than 1,500 points - that's a CRASH. But if I happen to be overheard when I say that, people are looking at me, 'Where is your American flag?

Remember who you are and what happened to you. Would you like to help Osama bin Laden in his plot to destroy our economy? 'That's unbelievable! "

But, like many other media-brainwashed Americans, this trader, in his own words, was "following the program." It is not a crash, it is a terrorist event.

"A CLOCKWORK ORANGE FUTURE?

A few nights after the September 11 attacks, CNN posted images on the screen as the National Guard patrolled the streets of Washington and heavily armed Special Police in New York City controlled cars at a tunnel entrance.Then pictures of the Israeli military personnel were playing on the streets of Jerusalem, controlling the cars. The spokesman voices of CNN News Witch Greta van Susteren, a regular featured personality of that media sewer, along with Mossad agent Wolf Blitzer, spoke of America, which in response to the "terrorist threat" is increasingly becoming a "police-supervised society," where civil rights to Protection of its citizens would have to be sacrificed. We have seen this before, she said, not only in Jerusalem, but also in Belfast, Northern Ireland, in response to the "political terrorism" of the IRA and the Protestant militias.

After a while people get used to it, she said. "Life goes on." Interviews with Israelis were presented that seemed to agree with the view that under conditions of "internal war on terrorists" one must be prepared for civil rights victims. "The Americans will get used to it, as we do," said the Israeli.

Thus, the media is preparing the country - or more precisely, conditioning it - to adopt a form of police state, justified by a threat that one can not really cope with and whose true source is concealed. Not surprisingly, when Attorney General John Ashcroft proposed a legislation on the elimination of civil rights, it was relatively scarcely mentioned by the same media.

FAIR reported that two of the three news channels never reported it, while it was barely mentioned on CNN or Fox News. Although the print media reported it, they maintained the leitmotif of the "necessary sacrifice" of civilians for personal safety.

Back in the mid-1970s, Eric Trist and Fred Emery, two leading Tavistock brainwashers and "experts" on the effects of the mass media, predicted that by the end of the century the United States would probably have become such a fascist police state.

The two developed a theory of "social turbulence" exposing a society to a series of "shocks" - administered and administered, mass phenomena - energy shortages, economic and financial collapse, and

TERRORIST ATTACKS

If the "shocks" follow each other quickly and if they are dealt with increasing intensity, then it is possible to put the whole of society in a state of mass psychosis, said Trist and Emery.

They said that individuals isolate themselves when they try to escape the terror of the shocking emerging reality; People would retreat into a state of rejection, into popular conversation and amusement, helplessly exposed to the outpourings of frenzy.

That rage could be easily controlled by those, said the two brainwashers who have access and control over the means of mass communication, notably television.

It was the view of Trist and Emery, in two elaborations widely disseminated among the networks of brainwashing and social psychiatrists in association with Tavistock and among the masters of the psycho-warfare of the United States and Britain, that the process of television itself is a brainwashing mechanism.

They cited their own studies that, regardless of content, habitual television weaken the cognitive powers of the mind and have a narcotic effect on the central nervous system, making it easier for the habitual viewer to make suggestions and manipulations; in addition, they found that such effectively brainwashed " zombies " hysterically deny that something was wrong with them, or that such manipulation of their "thinking" was even possible.

In a frosty metaphor, Trist and Emery suggested that the terrorized, violent society of Anthony Burgess's "Clockwork Orange" book, which was filmed by Stanley Kubrick, would be the logical social outcome for an America by the end of the century, which would be more when 50 years ago mass brainwashing by the "telly" would be subject.

Burgess' world is one of incessant violence and terrorism as a daily part of life; it is accepted that if you went out at a certain time or came to certain neighborhoods, you would be attacked and / or killed.

There is no motive for violence - it is accidental and incomprehensible, and thus terrorizing. The wealthy are protected; everyone else is told to do their daily work with the awareness of the risk.

When the youth terrorist groups roam the streets, people stay in the house, watching their TV conversations, or just going to certain areas that are heavily protected by the police and the military. The most disgusting thing about Burgess's image is the perception of hopelessness, the inevitability that nothing can be done about it - it's "as it is," as Dan Rather's predecessor, CBS News Moderator, Walter Cronkite, usually reminded us of every night, when he completed his broadcast.

Although the thesis of Trist / Emery does not necessarily have to be read in the caves of Afghanistan, it is quite familiar with the psycho-warriors and brainwashers who started a war against the American people.

There is a certain kind of oligarchic evil that thinks like these, who see a Clockwork Orange society as a necessary result to protect their continued privileges and power. So have we Americans already been so brainwashed that we would let this happen? The following weeks and months will tell us if we really have the moral capacity to survive.

"The end of the world. Details at 11. Now back to your routine programming. "

Remember: The first step to breaking away from the brainwashing of the mass media and its evil embraces is to realize that you and the others are indeed brainwashed. From there it will be a lot easier and things will be much clearer.

10 strategies of manipulation

1. Attract attention
The key element in controlling society is to divert the public's attention to minor events in order to distract them from important information about actual changes by the political and economic governing bodies. That strategy is the cornerstone that prevents the grassroots interest in education, economics, psychology, neurobiology and cybernetics. Thus, public opinion turns its back on real social problems, sprinkled and distracted by unimportant matters. Get the company busy, employ them, keep them busy so they do not have time to think about something, according to the level of an animal.

2. Create problems and provide the solution
This method is called the "problem response solution". A problem or situation is created to trigger a reaction among the recipients who then expect a preventive approach. Spread violence or inflict bloody attacks so that society accepts a tightening of legal norms and laws at the expense of their own freedom. Or create an economic crisis to justify a radical curtailment of fundamental rights and the dismantling of social services.

3rd level changes ab
Move the boundaries of changes step by step, step by step, year by year. In this way, in 1980 and 1990, the new radical socio-economic conditions were imposed (neoliberalism): a minimum of testimonies, privatization, insecurity, and what the next day brings is elasticity, mass unemployment, and influence on the level of income , the lack of warranty on fair wage work.

4. Postponing changes
The following possibility of accepting a change unwanted by the company is to present it as a "painful must" so that society allows it to be introduced in the future. It is easier to accept future victims than to expose them immediately. In addition, society has the naive tendency to rewrite negative changes with an "everything will be alright". This strategy gives citizens more time to become aware of the change and to turn acceptance into a kind of resignation.

5. Speak to the masses, as to young children
The majority of the contents that are addressed to the public are abused by the way of proclamation; They are manipulated by arguments or even by a patronizing tone usually used in a conversation with children or mentally handicapped people. The more one wants to obfuscate the person in front of his eyes, the better one resorts to this technique. Why? If you talk to a person as if she was 12 years old, it's because you want to suggest that to her. She will most likely respond uncritically or answer as if she were actually 12 years old.

6. Focus on Emotions, not Reflection
Misuse of the emotional aspect is a classic technique to circumvent a rational analysis and common sense of an individual. In addition, an emotional speech opens the door to ideologies, needs, fears and riots, impulses and certain subconscious behaviors.

7. Attempt to uphold the ignorance of society
The masses should not be able to recognize the methods and control techniques. Education offered to the social underclass should be as simple as possible so that academic knowledge is not comprehensible to them. 

8. Arouse in the population the idea that it is average
Achieve that the citizens begin to believe that it is normal and timely to be stupid, vulgar and uneducated.

9. Transform resistance into a feeling of guilty conscience
Allow society to think that they are the only culprits of their non-success due to lack of intelligence, competence or effort. The "system" thus counteracts a rebellion of the population by suggesting to the citizen that he is to blame for all evil and thus reduces his self-esteem. This leads to depression and blockade of further action. Without action there is no revolution!

10. Get to Know People Better Than Doing Themselves
Over the last 50 years, scientific progress has created a gulf between the knowledge available to the masses and the one reserved for the narrow elite. Thanks to biology, neurobiology and applied psychology, the "system" has achieved the knowledge of human reality in the physical as well as in the psychic realm. At present, the "system" knows man, the individual citizen, better than himself, and thus has greater control over the individual.

***

With this knowledge and more, we are exposed to brainwashing day after day, created by scientists at the Tavistock Institute and its many offshoots around the world, to enslave us as our ultimate goal, without our being aware of it. The elite of the world has the power and the money to influence our lives. We need to wake up and recognize the dangers, to oppose being enslaved.

Edward Bernays, a nephew of Freud wrote in 1928 in his book "Propaganda":

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the common habitus and the opinion of the masses is an important element of a democratic society. Those who manipulate this nondescript mechanism of society form an invisible government that is the true ruling power in our country. We are mastered, our minds are modeled, our tastes are shaped, our ideas given, and all of those we have never heard of. In every aspect of our daily lives, be it in politics or in business affairs, in our social behavior or our concept of ethics, we are dominated by this relatively small group. "

Fear, insecurity and security are "universal concepts". Those who control the system are aware of and benefit from it. It's a science of its own, with its own behavioral studies and thought tanks (RAND, Tavistock, etc.)

Of course, as the system uses routines to create expectations, it is not a problem to cause panic and disorientation through a particular incident, and then, during the temporary chaos, make the desired changes.

That's how it has been for centuries, and unless we turn our minds on, it will continue at the expense of our freedom: security against freedom!

This process is described in the book "Battle for the Mind" by W. Sargant, a scientist at Tavistock Institute:

"You can implant countless ideas and beliefs into the masses once you've messed up the natural functioning of your brain through accidentally or intentionally created fear, anger, or agitation. The most common consequences of such confusion are impaired judgment and increased suggestibility. Their manifestation in the group is often described as "herd instinct" and occurs particularly in wartime, during serious epidemics and in similar situations of community threat, which increased the anxiety and thus the influencing of the individual and the masses.

W. Sargant wrote this in 1957 and it is exactly what we experience in the media today.

The actions of individuals are inflated and taken as an opportunity by the media and governments to implement the already planned security measures.

There are SMS alerts for everything: Stock quotes, traffic jams, escaped pedophiles, missing children, pop concerts, weather reports, sun exposure, yellow alert, orange and red and so on.

Our world is slowly but surely turning into a madhouse full of disoriented people who are less and less aware and less and less eavesdropping, not to mention an authority in the form of a fellow human being. Pollution and annihilation and climate change have become ubiquitous concepts and spread fear and terror. They are cross-border and give global authorities, such as the United Nations, more and more power and leverage.

Global solutions to "global" problems. These organizations include UNESCO, the World Bank, WHO, the US military and the Rockefeller Foundation. More precisely, the perpetrators of global problems now present the proposed solutions.

So the key question we have to ask ourselves is :

• Who is sitting by the levers driving this centrally controlled system?
• Who benefits from this total integration?
• What is the future ahead of us?

A process that has been going on for centuries is now coming to an end. This process can be harmonious or abrupt with chaos. People who only deal with their daily lives will experience an unpleasant surprise.

***

John Coleman - The Tavistock Institute: Order Manipulation